2009
DOI: 10.1600/036364409788606325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Morphology-Based Cladistic Analysis of Digitaria (Poaceae, Panicoideae, Paniceae)

Abstract: A phylogenetic analysis was performed on 67 species of Digitaria belonging to four subgenera and 26 of the 32 sections recognized in Henrard's monograph. The analysis was based on 113 discrete and six continuous morphological characters. In the resulting topologies the genus Digitaria was monophyletic. In spite of the low support for most groupings, several clades were recovered. The subdivision of Digitaria in the four subgenera proposed by Henrard was not supported since the large subgenus Digitaria appears… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, leaf micro morphological qualitative and quantative traits were used for the first time in phylogenetic analysis of Pteridaceae. A similar morphology based cladistics have been reported in many plant groups including ferns (Naczi, ; Sundue, ; Vega et al, ). Additional research on anatomical features should be continued to obtain more useful characters for ferns phylogeny.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Moreover, leaf micro morphological qualitative and quantative traits were used for the first time in phylogenetic analysis of Pteridaceae. A similar morphology based cladistics have been reported in many plant groups including ferns (Naczi, ; Sundue, ; Vega et al, ). Additional research on anatomical features should be continued to obtain more useful characters for ferns phylogeny.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…1b). The genetic differentiation of these two related wild species from D. lecardii is also supported by their morpho-botanical divergence (Henrard 1950;Vega et al 2009). …”
Section: Aflp Efficiency and Phylogenetic Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Goloboff et al (2006) implemented algorithms in the software TNT (Goloboff et al, 2008) for the analysis of continuous characters as additive characters, allowing the exploration of several new approaches in cladistic analysis. This development has allowed several empiric studies to explore the use of continuous characters without confining the variation into discrete units (Pereyra and Mound, 2009;Vega et al, 2009), which usually relied on arbitrary or loosely justified criteria. The direct implementation of continuous characters is useful to consider variation in such unidimensional space as direct measurements or ratios.…”
Section: More Information From the Same Characters: Morphometrics Andmentioning
confidence: 99%