1987
DOI: 10.1093/nar/15.3.1047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A monoclonal antibody to triplex DNA binds to eucaryotic chromosomes

Abstract: A monoclonal antibody (Jel 318) was produced by immunizing mice with poly[d(TmC)].poly[d(GA)].poly[d(mCT) which forms a stable triplex at neutral pH. Jel 318 did not bind to calf thymus DNA or other non pyrimidine.purine DNAs such as poly[d(TG)].poly[d(CA)]. In addition the antibody did not recognize pyrimidine.purine DNAs containing mA (e.g. poly[d(TC)].poly[d(GmA)]) which cannot form a triplex since the methyl group blocks Hoogsteen base-pairing. The binding of Jel 318 to chromosomes was assessed by immunofl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(32 reference statements)
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, a perfect internal symmetry of the half-sites would signi®cantly decrease the structural¯exibility of the target DNA, rendering conformational shifting energetically di cult, if not impossible. Formation of non-B-DNA in vivo has been documented (Lee et al, 1987;Sen and Gilbert, 1988;Wittig et al, 1989Wittig et al, , 1992Ward et al, 1991;Michelotti et al, 1996), and topologically constrained chromosomal DNA undergoes conformational changes that are regulated and coordinated with cellular processes (reviewed in: DroÈ ge, 1994;van Holde and Zlatanova, 1994;Leach, 1994). Structural transitions may be supported by other proteins that could stabilize or even promote the extrusion of the alternative conformations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, a perfect internal symmetry of the half-sites would signi®cantly decrease the structural¯exibility of the target DNA, rendering conformational shifting energetically di cult, if not impossible. Formation of non-B-DNA in vivo has been documented (Lee et al, 1987;Sen and Gilbert, 1988;Wittig et al, 1989Wittig et al, , 1992Ward et al, 1991;Michelotti et al, 1996), and topologically constrained chromosomal DNA undergoes conformational changes that are regulated and coordinated with cellular processes (reviewed in: DroÈ ge, 1994;van Holde and Zlatanova, 1994;Leach, 1994). Structural transitions may be supported by other proteins that could stabilize or even promote the extrusion of the alternative conformations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raghavan et al (2006) recently summarized chemical probing procedures to detect non-B DNA structures in mammalian genomic DNA using either bisulfite or KMnO 4 /OsO 4 [107]. Triplex-specific monoclonal antibodies have been developed and used to probe the conformation of H-DNA in vivo [108,109]. The triplex-specific antibodies showed significant binding to the nuclei and this binding could be inhibited by competing triplex DNA [110].…”
Section: Detecting H-dna In Vitro and In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Triplex-specific Antibody Binds to bcl-2 Mbr-To independently test for triplex character at the bcl-2 Mbr, we used monoclonal antibodies that are known to bind triplex DNA but do not bind single-stranded or double-stranded DNA (33,34). The Jel466 antibody has a binding preference for GC-rich triplexes (33), whereas the Jel318 antibody has been shown to bind to AT-rich triplexes (34) (33,34).…”
Section: More Than One Non-b Conformation Exists At the Bcl-2 Mbrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Jel466 antibody has a binding preference for GC-rich triplexes (33), whereas the Jel318 antibody has been shown to bind to AT-rich triplexes (34) (33,34).…”
Section: More Than One Non-b Conformation Exists At the Bcl-2 Mbrmentioning
confidence: 99%