2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A molecular epidemiological perspective of rhinovirus types circulating in Amsterdam from 2007 to 2012

Abstract: Rhinoviruses (RVs) are frequently detected respiratory viruses that cause mild common cold symptoms, but may also lead to more severe respiratory tract infections. The large number of RV types, classified into species A, B and C, hampers clear insights into the epidemiology and clinical significance of each RV type. The aim of this study was to map the circulation of RV types in the Amsterdam area. RV-positive nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal samples, collected from 2007 to 2012 in the Academic Medical Centre … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
25
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(30 reference statements)
12
25
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 1,003 samples, 280 (27.9%) were positive for HRV (HRV-A, 50.0%; HRV-B, 7.5%; HRV-C, 20%; and HRV-untyped, 22.5%). This HRV detection rate is consistent with prior studies (11.0–40.6%) worldwide, as are the proportions of the three HRV species (HRV-A, 44.4–56%; HRV-B, 2–12%; and HRV-C, 25–45.3%) ( Xiang et al, 2010 ; Henquell et al, 2012 ; Rahamat-Langendoen et al, 2013 ; Marcone et al, 2014 ; Tsatsral et al, 2015 ; Xiao et al, 2015 ; Milanoi et al, 2016 ; van der Linden et al, 2016 ; Blaschke et al, 2018 ). This prevalence of HRV-untyped is higher than in a recent study in Chongqing (13%) ( Xiao et al, 2015 ), perhaps because our study involved patients with SARI.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the 1,003 samples, 280 (27.9%) were positive for HRV (HRV-A, 50.0%; HRV-B, 7.5%; HRV-C, 20%; and HRV-untyped, 22.5%). This HRV detection rate is consistent with prior studies (11.0–40.6%) worldwide, as are the proportions of the three HRV species (HRV-A, 44.4–56%; HRV-B, 2–12%; and HRV-C, 25–45.3%) ( Xiang et al, 2010 ; Henquell et al, 2012 ; Rahamat-Langendoen et al, 2013 ; Marcone et al, 2014 ; Tsatsral et al, 2015 ; Xiao et al, 2015 ; Milanoi et al, 2016 ; van der Linden et al, 2016 ; Blaschke et al, 2018 ). This prevalence of HRV-untyped is higher than in a recent study in Chongqing (13%) ( Xiao et al, 2015 ), perhaps because our study involved patients with SARI.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…HRV-C is more frequently associated with wheezing episodes, asthma exacerbations, and lower respiratory tract infections compared with HRV-A and -B ( Linsuwanon et al, 2009 ; Gern, 2010 ; Bizzintino et al, 2011 ). However, there is reportedly no relationship between disease severity and HRV species ( Lee et al, 2012 ; Chen et al, 2015 ; van der Linden et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unexpectedly, more than half of the VP4 reads for March, October, November, and December were classified as rhinovirus (Table S1) and, as expected, rhinovirus exhibited a characteristic spring and fall seasonal trend (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material) (47). Although the detection of rhinoviruses in municipal wastewater is intriguing, it was not surprising that the VP4 primers used in this study cross-reacted with rhinoviruses because the MD91 forward primer matched perfectly to many NCBI rhinovirus genotypes (data not shown) and the OL-68 reverse primer has been shown to anneal to rhinovirus genomes (48).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The majority of studies conducted in many parts of the world have consistently reported that RV-A, B, and C are detected in 48% to 65%, 2% to 12%, and 26% to 44% of samples, respectively. 4,5,7,9,12,[14][15][16][17][18][19]26,27,30,[32][33][34][35] Our study is unique to many other studies in that we assessed viral types in a communitybased rural setting, using prospective surveillance, compared with the clinic or hospital-based surveillance in more urban settings.…”
Section: Illness Severitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no differences in illness severity between RV species were found in other studies. [14][15][16][17][18][19] The epidemiology and clinical significance of specific RV types have not been analyzed for very young infants in a rural community setting. The molecular characterization of RV infections is limited for RV circulating in developing countries, including countries in Asia, such as Nepal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%