Milwaukee Fire Department (Ret.), Milwaukee TOMISLOV MATIC Milwaukee Fire Department (Ret.), MilwaukeeRecruits from 9 consecutive fire academy classes were assessed on a battery of strength and endurance measures at Weeks 1, 7, and 14 of training. Regression analyses using Week 1 measures indicated that strength variables were the primary predictors of performance on physically demanding firefighting tasks assessed at the completion of training. Incremental validity was obtained with the addition of aerobic capacity, which produced more accurate performance distinctions among recruits with high strength levels. Results showed predictive validity and linearity throughout the upper range of strength and endurance levels, but evidence of an increased drop-off in performance for recruits with strength levels below the male 25th percentile. Structural equation modeling, a more powerful and comprehensive approach to validation than traditional regression, provided strong support for the construct validity of general strength and endurance as predictors of firefighter performance on physically demanding fire suppression and rescue tasks.Physical ability selection tests for municipal firefighters rapidly shifted away from the use of measures of strength and endurance based on criterion or construct validation models, following an initially successful legal challenge to this approach (Berkman v. the City of New York, 1982). The federal trial court ruled that although the test was professionally developed, the research on which it was based measured general human ability rather than firefighting skills in particular. Assessments of muscular strength and general fitness were largely replaced by tests based on a content validity strategy using simulated fire suppression and rescue tasks. This change was probably due in part to the perception that such tasks would be more readily accepted as "job related" by courts than field tests derived fromCorrespondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to