2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2950375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Modified Hybrid Maximum Power Point Tracking Method for Photovoltaic Arrays Under Partially Shading Condition

Abstract: To ensure the photovoltaic (PV) arrays under partial shading condition(PSC) could still output maximum power quickly and efficiently, this work presents a modified hybrid maximum power point tracking (MPPT) method, which applies artificial neural network (ANN) to the modified perturb and observe (MP&O). Instead of using expensive illumination intensity sensors directly, the illumination intensity on each module in the PV array can be obtained indirectly by sampling the specific points of their own cheaper volt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach, however, still suffers from slow speeds and high power loss [5], [18]. The next class of GMPPT methods involve artificial neural networks (ANN) [19]- [22]. Many of the bioinspired methods such as artificial bee colony [23], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [24], [25], gray wolfe optimization [26], [27], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach, however, still suffers from slow speeds and high power loss [5], [18]. The next class of GMPPT methods involve artificial neural networks (ANN) [19]- [22]. Many of the bioinspired methods such as artificial bee colony [23], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [24], [25], gray wolfe optimization [26], [27], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modified butterfly optimization algorithm is one of the bio-inspired algorithms that has been hybridized with a constant impedance method to improve the response time to one second [34]. Some other methods that have been combined into hybrid algorithms are PSO along with Distributed Evaluation [5], ANN with conventional and modified P&O or INC [19], [20]. However, these methods remain highly computationally intensive [35] and the accuracy of the output depends on the learning dataset and the initial conditions [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a large value of ΔD, the P&O algorithm tracks the MPP at a faster rate but has large steady‐state power oscillations at MPP, and for small values of ΔD the steady‐state power oscillations at MPP is low but the algorithm takes more time to track the MPP. To address this trade‐off, different methods such as optimised P&O [25], modified P&O [24, 26–28], model predictive control [29], adaptive step size based P&O (ASDFP&O) [30–35] etc. are presented in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, hybrid MPPT methods have been developed to improve the performance of the above methods, such as the modified P&O with an artificial neural network (MP&O-ANN) [28], overall distribution with PSO (OD-PSO) [29], differential evolutionary with PSO (DE-PSO) [30], P&O with PSO (P&O-PSO) [31], grey wolf optimization with P&O (GWO-P&O) [32], incremental conductance with firefly algorithm (INC-FA) [33], and cuckoo search with golden section search (CS-GSS) [34]. These methods can find the GMPP, but they are algorithmically complex and have a long computing time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%