2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13498-2_45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Modified D-S Decision-Making Algorithm for Multi-sensor Target Identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, we compute the weights using the approaches of Deng et al (2004) (similarity measures) and Liang et al (2010) (uncertainty and credibility degree). The calculations are shown in Table 11.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, we compute the weights using the approaches of Deng et al (2004) (similarity measures) and Liang et al (2010) (uncertainty and credibility degree). The calculations are shown in Table 11.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensor reading reliability needs to be incorporated into the fusion process so as to avoid decreasing system performance (Elouedi, Mellouli, & Smets, 2004;Liu, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.08.024 0377-2217/Ó 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Dezert, Pan, & Mercier, 2011;Liang, Feng, & Liu, 2010). In fact, the reliability of pieces of evidence is an index for quantifying sensor performance and weighing readings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of consistency between two evidences reflects the degree of mutual support between the two pieces of evidence [45,46]; therefore, the support degree of each piece of evidence for Ej can be obtained by adding the rows or columns of the similarity matrix as follows [47]:Sup(mjfalse)=j=1ndij(i,j=1,2,,n)…”
Section: Improvements To the Traditional Evidence Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%