2015 IEEE International Electric Machines &Amp; Drives Conference (IEMDC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iemdc.2015.7409200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified analytical method for core losses calculation in magnetic laminations for a wide range of frequency and flux density

Abstract: In this paper, a modified analytical method, based on Maxwell's equations is developed to calculate core losses for a wide range of magnetic flux density and frequency. In this method average permeability from experiments and some available material's features are used to calculate both hysteresis and eddy current losses analytically. This method takes the skin effect into account and the real value of permeability, is defined to improve the method accuracy. The main advantage of this method is its simplicity … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discussions such as in Refs. [8,[24][25][26][27][28][29] are restricted to mathematical modelling that does not consider the complex interaction of impact factors such as anisotropy, nonlinearity and hysteresis. Concerning experimental measurements, some work is reported in Ref.…”
Section: Instantaneous Magnetization Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discussions such as in Refs. [8,[24][25][26][27][28][29] are restricted to mathematical modelling that does not consider the complex interaction of impact factors such as anisotropy, nonlinearity and hysteresis. Concerning experimental measurements, some work is reported in Ref.…”
Section: Instantaneous Magnetization Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, in fact simplifies the evaluation of (8) treating τ( f , µ) a constant. In [20], this constant µ is taken corresponding to the B max whereas, [21] suggests the µ at average value of excitation. However, the value of µ depends upon the magnetisation (as shown in Fig.…”
Section: A Eddy Current Loss(p Eddy )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, in fact simplifies the evaluation of (8) treating τ( f , µ) a constant. In [20], this constant µ is taken corresponding to the B max whereas, [21] suggests the µ at average value of excitation. However, the value of µ depends upon the magnetisation (as shown in Fig.2-(b)), and hence, it does not remain constant for all the instants of a time period.…”
Section: A Eddy Current Loss(p Eddy )mentioning
confidence: 99%