The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2018.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modelling framework to support power architecture trade-off studies for More-Electric Aircraft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional works developed in the context of the MISSION project propose test cases to demonstrate MISSION framework capabilities being developed to handle aircraft-system interaction, multifidelity models integration and trade-off studies. 5,6,72 In terms of validation, two different types of test scenarios are considered. The first is the evaluation of SUT impact on other systems or on the aircraft, and the second is the aircraft's or other system's impact on the SUT.…”
Section: Aircraft-level Integrated Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additional works developed in the context of the MISSION project propose test cases to demonstrate MISSION framework capabilities being developed to handle aircraft-system interaction, multifidelity models integration and trade-off studies. 5,6,72 In terms of validation, two different types of test scenarios are considered. The first is the evaluation of SUT impact on other systems or on the aircraft, and the second is the aircraft's or other system's impact on the SUT.…”
Section: Aircraft-level Integrated Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is mainly due to the one-way requirements flow (usually top-down), that leads to suboptimal solution at system level and is unable to capture the impact that a change at system level has on the aircraft level, thus limiting the adoption of novel system architectures. 5,6 Literature comprises of a wide range of alternative approaches to support system integration for aircraft design. Major efforts focus on the development and formalization of methodologies to support system integration and design optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the power requirements during emergency operations (e.g., rejected takeoff and one-engine landing) drive the sizing of the subsystems for power generation and transportation. Previous work demonstrated that the modeling framework used in this paper effectively captures the compound effects of changing multiple technological solutions and discussed implementation details for an actuation use case [53].…”
Section: Architecture Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work in the context of the MISSION project focuses on the integration of the system-level dynamics with the aircraft-level [51] and the design of controls for multiple aircraft systems [52]. This paper leverages the modeling framework proposed in Garcia Garriga et al [53] to enable trade-off studies among multiple power architectures in the evaluation of aircraft system architectures and proposes a principled approach to reduce the architecture design space and speed up the identification of the optimal architecture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, with the development of artificial intelligence and information technologies, model-based system engineering (MBSE) [8][9][10] and optimization-assisted design [11] have become the focus of researchers, becoming increasingly mature, and will be particularly powerful for the design of aircraft power systems. In this context, models of the electrical environment control system (ECS) [12,13], electromagnetic actuators (EMAs) [14][15][16][17], and electro-hydraulic actuators (EHAs) [16,18,19] were established to support the trade-offs between the weight and power loss of More-electric systems. To implement these analyses, machine models for optimal designs have been widely investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%