2011 10th International Conference on Mobile Business 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icmb.2011.43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model to Identify the Dimensions of Mobile Service Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above parameters can be linked to the model proposed by Stiakakis and Georgiadis (2011) on m-service quality parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The above parameters can be linked to the model proposed by Stiakakis and Georgiadis (2011) on m-service quality parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chae, Kim, Kim and Ryu (2002) provided connection quality, content quality, interaction quality and contextual quality as the dimensions of m-service quality. However, Stiakakis and Georgiadis (2011) suggest that these only focus on information quality, rather than service quality. Lim, Widdows and Park (2006) identified five dimensions of perceived quality of m-services, namely, pricing plans, network quality, data services, billing system and customer service.…”
Section: Relationship Between Mobile and Electronic Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Through the expert review, valence [13,35] is not compatible to be listed under dialogue because this component was not directly showing the communication between company and customer but more to focus only towards customer impression. Valence is discarded to be listed under dialog because valence only involved customers' impressions that want to have good experience with the service compared to dialogue that insisted that both sides (company-customer) should interact with each other, therefore, it is shown clearly that there is no dialogue element in valence as it only involved one side and there is no interaction process happened .…”
Section: Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of the author's knowledge, these scales have not been examined and validated extensively in Malaysia. This model is a contemporary approach which could define service quality in the mobile context (Stiakakis & Georgiadis, 2011). In this particular model, service quality is divided into three main dimensions: interaction quality, environmental quality, and outcome quality.…”
Section: Mobile Service Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%