2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.08.24.505193
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model predictive control strategy to regulate movements and interactions

Abstract: Humans are adept at moving the arm to interact with objects and surfaces. The brain is thought to regulate motion and interactions using two different controllers, one specialized for movements and the other for force regulation. However, it remains unclear whether different control mechanisms are necessary. Here we show that the brain can employ a single high-level control strategy for both movement and interaction control. The Model Predictive Control (MPC) strategy introduced in this paper uses an internal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent work, the MPC framework was combined with an impedance controller to demonstrate its ability to handle nonlinear dynamics and changing environments (i.e. force fields) during movement [51]. Thanks to the recursive computations of the feedback gains inherent to this framework, Model Predictive Control was also used to investigate the control horizon in sensorimotor control [35][36][37].…”
Section: Plos Computational Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent work, the MPC framework was combined with an impedance controller to demonstrate its ability to handle nonlinear dynamics and changing environments (i.e. force fields) during movement [51]. Thanks to the recursive computations of the feedback gains inherent to this framework, Model Predictive Control was also used to investigate the control horizon in sensorimotor control [35][36][37].…”
Section: Plos Computational Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the presence of feedback does not automatically affect the feedforward control. The second one is to consider a model predictive control approach [54][55][56]. Intermittent feedback control could allow the system to re-estimate its current state and plan a feedforward motor command on a receding horizon [57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent work, this framework was combined with an impedance controller to demonstrate its ability to handle nonlinear dynamics and changing environments (i.e. force fields) during movement (45). Here, we combined this MPC framework with the continuous evaluation of the cost-to-go function by generalizing the previous implementation (25) proposed by Nashed and colleagues by integrating the reward within the cost-to-go function through a positive cost bias for the less rewarding options.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%