2023
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous evaluation of cost-to-go for flexible reaching control and online decisions

Antoine De Comite,
Philippe Lefèvre,
Frédéric Crevecoeur

Abstract: Humans consider the parameters linked to movement goal during reaching to adjust their control strategy online. Indeed, rapid changes in target structure or disturbances interfering with their initial plan elicit rapid changes in behavior. Here, we hypothesize that these changes could result from the continuous use of a decision variable combining motor and cognitive components. We combine an optimal feedback controller with a real-time evaluation of the expected cost-to-go, which considers target- and movemen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 100 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the limitations, the simple linearized OFC models were crucial in determining the relationship between three properties of the task demands, its impact on coarticulation, and feedback control. Our approach is consistent with how ideal actor/estimator models have been predominantly employed as normative models in formalizing an initial hypothesis, and simulating these to generate testable predictions (29,33,(35)(36)(37)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59). Such normative models should be distinguished from detailed biomechanical models that can trade-off interpretability and predictability for achieving better quantitative fits.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Despite the limitations, the simple linearized OFC models were crucial in determining the relationship between three properties of the task demands, its impact on coarticulation, and feedback control. Our approach is consistent with how ideal actor/estimator models have been predominantly employed as normative models in formalizing an initial hypothesis, and simulating these to generate testable predictions (29,33,(35)(36)(37)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59). Such normative models should be distinguished from detailed biomechanical models that can trade-off interpretability and predictability for achieving better quantitative fits.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%