A model of self-directed learning in internal medicine residency: a qualitative study using grounded theory

Abstract

BackgroundExisting theories of self-directed learning (SDL) have emphasized the importance of process, personal, and contextual factors. Previous medical education research has largely focused on the process of SDL. We explored the experience with and perception of SDL among internal medicine residents to gain understanding of the personal and contextual factors of SDL in graduate medical education.MethodsUsing a constructivist grounded theory approach, we conducted 7 focus group interviews with 46 internal medicine residents at an academic medical center. We processed the data by using open coding and writing analytic memos. Team members organized open codes to create axial codes, which were applied to all transcripts. Guided by a previous model of SDL, we developed a theoretical model that was revised through constant comparison with new data as they were collected, and we refined the theory until it had adequate explanatory power and was appropriately grounded in the experiences of residents.ResultsWe developed a theoretical model of SDL to explain the process, personal, and contextual factors affecting SDL during residency training. The process of SDL began with a trigger that uncovered a knowledge gap. Residents progressed to formulating learning objectives, using resources, applying knowledge, and evaluating learning. Personal factors included motivations, individual characteristics, and the change in approach to SDL over time. Contextual factors included the need for external guidance, the influence of residency program structure and culture, and the presence of contextual barriers.ConclusionsWe developed a theoretical model of SDL in medical education that can be used to promote and assess resident SDL through understanding the process, person, and context of SDL.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-017-0869-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

An Investigation of Self-Directed Learning Skills of Undergraduate Students

“…Also in some studies there have been recommended models for development of university students (Aly et al, 2003; Mamary and Charles, 2003; Beach, 2017; Sawatsky et al, 2017). Most of the participants in the studies are university students and adults.…”

Characteristics and quality of rotation-specific resident learning goals: a prospective study

“…Setting learning goals is an essential step in self-regulated learning, which Zimmerman defined as 'self-generated thoughts, feelings and actions to attain learning goals' and has several features, including 1) the purposive use of specific processes, strategies, or responses to improve academic achievement; 2) a self-oriented feedback loop during learning to monitor the effectiveness of the learning process, strategy, or response; and 3) a motivational dimension describing how and why a particular process, strategy, or response was chosen [2]. In clinical training in the health professions, self-regulated learning is a cyclical process, situated in a learning environment, where learners respond to clinical demands by setting goals, creating a learning plan, deploying learning strategies, and assessing their progress to those goals [3,4]. Setting effective goals affects learners' choice of activities and increases motivation for learning, therefore increasing effort, persistence on task, and feelings of satisfaction in achieving outcomes [5].…”

“…Second, residents and faculty members variably integrate learning goals into clinical learning, providing variable accountability and motivation to achieve learning goals [6,7]. Third, residents struggle with goal setting and identify the need for faculty guidance in self-regulated learning, including assistance for setting learning goals [8,9].…”

Gamifying anatomy education

“…How can this be done? While others have defined gamification broadly, including augmented reality (Ma et al, ; McCoy et al, ), we chose to define it as a platform not just for “digital games” per se but one comprising interventions such as flipped classroom (Chen et al, ) , self‐directed learning (SDL) (Sawatsky et al, ), script concordance testing (Cooke et al, ; Power et al, ), and use of apps as behavior modifiers (Gorgolewski et al, ; Lukhele et al, ). Students were incentivized to take part in the gaming by winning chocolate treats and also a book prize.…”