Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - 1986
DOI: 10.3115/981131.981146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model of revision in natural language generation

Abstract: We outline a model of generation with revision, focusing on improving textual coherence. We argue that high quality text is more easily produced by iteratively revising and regenerating, as people do, rather than by using an architecturally more complex single pass generator. As a general area of study, the revision process presents interesting problems: Recognition of flaws in text requires a descriptive theory of what constitutes well written prose and a parser which can build a representation in those terms… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In similar work, Vaughan (1986) has proposed to use a plan and critique cycle to produce text. For modeling extemporaneous language production, however, critiquing is too time~consuming, and more reliable planning mechanisms are needed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In similar work, Vaughan (1986) has proposed to use a plan and critique cycle to produce text. For modeling extemporaneous language production, however, critiquing is too time~consuming, and more reliable planning mechanisms are needed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model of a revision was first brought into discussion by Vaughan and McDonald [79], but more practical definition can be found in [45]. Later the concept was successfully implemented in NLG systems in early developments [69,22].…”
Section: Revision Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basically, this requires NLG techniques which do not take non-linguistic information as input, but rather (possibly ungrammatical) linguistic information (phrases or text fragments), and as a result this approach to NLG is sometimes referred to as text-to-text generation. It bears a strong conceptual resemblance to text revision, an area of NLG which received some scholarly attention in the 1980s and 1990s (e.g., [8,9]). It has turned out that text-to-text generation lends itself well for data-oriented approaches, in part because textual training and evaluation material are easy to come by.…”
Section: Prefacementioning
confidence: 99%