1979
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04749.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model of Fire Selection for Serotiny in Lodgepole Pine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Within stands the polymorphism for cone type is probably a result of (a) gene flow and spatial variability in disturbance and (b) temporal variability in disturbance on the site. The importance of temporal and spatial variability in maintaining the polymorphism in serotiny in P. contorta reported here was predicted by Perry and Lotan (1979). Essentially, selection on cone types is disruptive between generations and this variability in disturbance maintains the polymorphism for cone type within populations.…”
Section: Maintenance Of Variability In Cone Typessupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Within stands the polymorphism for cone type is probably a result of (a) gene flow and spatial variability in disturbance and (b) temporal variability in disturbance on the site. The importance of temporal and spatial variability in maintaining the polymorphism in serotiny in P. contorta reported here was predicted by Perry and Lotan (1979). Essentially, selection on cone types is disruptive between generations and this variability in disturbance maintains the polymorphism for cone type within populations.…”
Section: Maintenance Of Variability In Cone Typessupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Conversely, stands originating after non-fire related disturbances often had high proportions of open cones, regardless of their placement on the inferred fire frequency gradient. Observations from other areas have indicated that a single disturbance can have a strong effect on the level of cone serotiny in a stand (Lotan 1967, Givnish 1981, and this relationship was hypothesized for Pinus contorta by Perry and Lotan (1979).…”
Section: Correlations With Serotinymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most studies attempting to account for variation in the frequency of serotiny have focused on the frequency of stand-replacing fires, and high fire frequency is hypothesized to favor increased serotiny (Givnish 1981, Schoennagel et al 2003. Fire frequency is positively correlated with percentage serotiny in several species, and models and empirical work have suggested that increased fire frequency can select for serotiny (Perry and Lotan 1979, Muir and Lotan 1985, Lamont et al 1991, Gauthier et al 1996, Enright et al 1998, Schoennagel et al 2003, Radeloff et al 2004. Less attention has been given to the potential of biotic interactions to influence percentage serotiny, although population models suggest that any factor that depletes the canopy seed bank (e.g., pre-dispersal seed predation) can select against serotiny (Enright et al 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, why the frequency of serotiny is not higher in some pines (e.g., Pinus contorta ssp. latifolia) that frequently experience stand-replacing fires is unclear (Perry and Lotan 1979), especially when serotiny is favored over a wide range of fire frequencies (Enright et al 1998). This suggests that other factors are likely to affect the frequency of serotiny.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%