1981
DOI: 10.5465/255568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model of Corporate Performance as a Function of Environmental, Organizational, and Leadership Influences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
108
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
108
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We can demonstrate here the study drove in 1981 by Weiner and Mahoney (1981) who considered the power in 193 storing up affiliations. According to this study, management improves altogether influence two OP portions: profit and share cost.…”
Section: Leadership and Kmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We can demonstrate here the study drove in 1981 by Weiner and Mahoney (1981) who considered the power in 193 storing up affiliations. According to this study, management improves altogether influence two OP portions: profit and share cost.…”
Section: Leadership and Kmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B., and Wang, W. (2013).The impact of Leadership on OP is possibly the extremely important. Weiner and Mahoney (1981) studied the leadership in one hundred and ninety three industrial firms. As per this research, managerial practices have substantial influence on OP.…”
Section: Knowledge Management Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying argumentation here is that every single performance measure has its own flaws. By combining multiple measures, it is possible to compensate for these flaws (Weiner & Mahoney, 1981). In addition, Jusoh, Ibrahim, and Zainuddin (2008) find that the use of both financial and non-financial performance measures lead to better performance.…”
Section: H2: Companies Tend To Use Lower Target Levels For Their Exementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They argue that top management successions can reduce conflict and provide a conduit for external information, which enables an organization to become better attuned to environmental demands (Guest, 1962;Helmich, 1974;Pfeffer & Salancik, 1977, 1978Virany, Tushman, & Romanelli, 1992) or to signal its intentions to change (Reinganum, 1985). Some of the studies have even shown that up to 40% of the variance of organizational performance can be explained by such leader changes (Day & Lord, 1988;Pfeffer & DavisBlake, 1986;Weiner & Mahoney, 1981).…”
Section: State Of Prior Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%