2022
DOI: 10.3390/catal12010098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model of Catalytic Cracking: Catalyst Deactivation Induced by Feedstock and Process Variables

Abstract: Changes in the quality of the feedstocks generated by involving various petroleum fractions in catalytic cracking significantly affect catalyst deactivation, which stems from coke formed on the catalyst surface. By conducting experimental studies on feedstocks and catalysts, as well as using industrial data, we studied how the content of saturates, aromatics and resins (SAR) in feedstock and the main process variables, including temperature, consumptions of the feedstock, catalyst and slops, influence the form… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, the bentonite-ZrP revealed a decrease in the catalyst activity up to 1.12%, which produced 84.93% conversion and moderately decreased to 84.02% at four consecutive runs. The decrease in the conversion at four consecutive runs was presumably due to the deactivation of the catalyst through the undesired coke formation 84 The catalyst's surface was covered by coke and clogged the catalyst's active site. 85 Under these conditions, the reactant and catalyst sites had limited accessibility, which inhibited the hydrocracking reaction's effectiveness, 86 thereby reducing the CPO conversion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the bentonite-ZrP revealed a decrease in the catalyst activity up to 1.12%, which produced 84.93% conversion and moderately decreased to 84.02% at four consecutive runs. The decrease in the conversion at four consecutive runs was presumably due to the deactivation of the catalyst through the undesired coke formation 84 The catalyst's surface was covered by coke and clogged the catalyst's active site. 85 Under these conditions, the reactant and catalyst sites had limited accessibility, which inhibited the hydrocracking reaction's effectiveness, 86 thereby reducing the CPO conversion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar trend was also reported by other reports. 92 The formation of coke was undesired since it could inhibit the hydrocracking process. 71 Coke had the capability of covering the catalyst surface and clogging the acid sites of the catalyst.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve profitability, refineries are trying to process blends resembling in their properties the design crude, which contain one or more cheaper crudes (opportunity crudes) [11]. The processing of petroleum mixtures can be accompanied by operational problems related to accelerated fouling [12][13][14], corrosion [15][16][17][18][19][20], equipment failure [21], catalyst deactivation [22][23][24], etc. Thus, the assumption that a refinery can refine economically favourable, environmentally friendly, and reliable petroleum crude blends whose characteristics are not too far away from the designed crude may be misleading [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%