1997
DOI: 10.2118/28489-pa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model for Predicting Injectivity Decline in Water-Injection Wells

Abstract: Summary We propose a new method to predict the injectivity decline for water-injection wells. Both internal and external filtration are considered in this method. A transition time from internal to external filtration is calculated by use of the trapping efficiency obtained from Stokesian dynamics simulations. The radius and the permeability of the damage zone are calculated by use of a deep-bed filtration model. Equations are derived that allow us to combine the flow resistance in the extern… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
71
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This cake was studied and characterized by several authors. 3,13,21,22 This is confirmed by the observation of an internal cake formed at the inlet of the column (Fig. 9).…”
Section: Injection Columnsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This cake was studied and characterized by several authors. 3,13,21,22 This is confirmed by the observation of an internal cake formed at the inlet of the column (Fig. 9).…”
Section: Injection Columnsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…external and internal filter cakes, wellbore fill-up and perforation plugging are responsible for decline in well injectivity. 3 Pang and Sharma 13 stated that internal and external filter cake formations are the dominant mechanisms. The degree of impairment of porous medium over a period of time depends on the concentration of suspended solids in the injected water, the injection flow rate, the porous rock formation and particles characteristics (types of minerals, grain size, pore access size), and the nature of the interaction between the injected particles and the reservoir rock.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle penetration into the formation stops at the transition moment, when retained particle concentration reaches the ␣-th fraction of porosity. It results in the following expression for transition time as expressed in pore volumes injected (Pang and Sharma, 1997;Sharma et al, 2000): (B-4) where ␣ is the critical porosity fraction, is filtration coefficient, c 0 is the injected particle concentration and r e is the drainage boundary radius. Let us introduce the well impedance as the ratio between the current dimensionless pressure draw-down and its initial value (B-5) Capture of injected particles with consequent permeability decline and formation of external filter cake yield the impedance growth.…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 and 3 for T > X is (Herzig et al 1970;Pang and Sharma 1997): Ahead of the concentration front T < X, both concentrations are zero.…”
Section: Deep-bed Filtration With a Single Particle-capture Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The explicit formula for suspended concentration allows calculation of the constant filtration coefficient from the constant outlet concentration (Pang and Sharma 1997;Wennberg and Sharma 1997). For the more general case when is not a constant, Λ = Λ(S) and the breakthrough curve C(1, T) determines the filtration coefficient.…”
Section: Deep-bed Filtration With a Single Particle-capture Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%