2019
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2019.1692126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for particle removal from surfaces with large-scale roughness in turbulent flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanism of developing strategy of L1 and L4 were demonstrated individually as Figure 7b. Under gentle L1 condition, the worse adhesion between developing solvent with mask surface re duce the opportunity of particle/solvent interaction, thus, the remaining fragments become hard defect after etching process [10][11] . However, after switching to the L4 condition, substantial improvement on opaque defect count reduction can be observed [12][13] .…”
Section: Table 2 Design Of Experiments (Doe) Of Developing Model (L1-l4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanism of developing strategy of L1 and L4 were demonstrated individually as Figure 7b. Under gentle L1 condition, the worse adhesion between developing solvent with mask surface re duce the opportunity of particle/solvent interaction, thus, the remaining fragments become hard defect after etching process [10][11] . However, after switching to the L4 condition, substantial improvement on opaque defect count reduction can be observed [12][13] .…”
Section: Table 2 Design Of Experiments (Doe) Of Developing Model (L1-l4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface roughness is regarded as one of the most influential variables affecting PM resuspension because it has a significant impact on the adhesion forces on multi-scales ( Qian, Peccia & Ferro, 2014 ). The largest scale of surface roughness that can affect PM resuspension could be the macrostructure of urban areas, such as buildings and tree canopies, and there are smaller surface roughness scales contributed by the shrubs/grass level ( Salizzoni et al, 2008 ; Nasr et al, 2020 ). However, most of the studies have been conducted on microscale surface roughness such as leaf morphology using a single leaf ( Speak et al, 2012 ; Wang, Shi & Wang, 2015 ; Chen et al, 2017 ; Xu et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the supporting asperities reduced the detaching moment due to a lower adhesive force and smaller contact radius. In Nasr et al (2019) the substrate roughness was described using a two-dimensional (2-D) sinusoidal profile. They found that the wavelength and amplitude of roughness structures had played an important role in the critical shear velocity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Re p ), a semi-empirical drag correlation was proposed by Schiller & Naumann (1933) for particles in unconfined flow. The drag correlation from the combination of O'Neill (1968) and Schiller & Naumann (1933) is generally accepted for calculating the drag coefficient of a particle on a smooth surface at a finite particle Reynolds number (Cui & Sommerfeld 2015;Nasr et al 2019). At Re p > 1000, the flow around the particle is fully turbulent, and the drag coefficient of the particle depends on the particle size compared with the height of the turbulent boundary layer (Sommerfeld, van Wachem & Oliemans 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation