2008 IEEE Congress on Services Part II (Services-2 2008) 2008
DOI: 10.1109/services-2.2008.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model Driven Service Identification Approach for Process Centric Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A considerable amount of research has been conducted on service identification methods to identify services in service-orientation, such as SIA (Service Identification Approach to SOA development) [4], SIU (Service Identification Using goal and scenario) [5], MDS (Model Driven Service identification) [6], SIP (Service Identification and Packaging) [7], and SIO (Service Identification via Ontology mapping) [8]. The most common approaches used to identify services are classified on the basis of two aspects: the business aspect and the technical aspect.…”
Section: Service Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A considerable amount of research has been conducted on service identification methods to identify services in service-orientation, such as SIA (Service Identification Approach to SOA development) [4], SIU (Service Identification Using goal and scenario) [5], MDS (Model Driven Service identification) [6], SIP (Service Identification and Packaging) [7], and SIO (Service Identification via Ontology mapping) [8]. The most common approaches used to identify services are classified on the basis of two aspects: the business aspect and the technical aspect.…”
Section: Service Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, studies have focused on identifying services in terms of business aspects using a defined alignment of software and business values [9], service identification using goal and scenario [5], and service identification through UML-based business process modeling [6]. However, important aspects have not been addressed in these researches: the method for alignment between business and services to improve traceability and unexpected changes in the business environment in terms of the market demand and supply.…”
Section: Service Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…differentiating between application and business services. Reference [20] introduces a semi-automated approach to identify services on process-oriented systems. It converts the UML-based business process models into XMI.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will be also used (along with a proposed metric) in identifying the 'right' services with optimal granularity. The closest service type classification in the literature to that in our approach identifies eight generic service types from a hierarchical perspective [20,21]. In contrast, our classification focus is on defining the purpose of the service, i.e.…”
Section: Defining Service Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fareghzadeh [9], S. Kim et al [10], and V. Dwivedi et al [11] proposed business-driven service identification methods using business process, business goal, and scenario. In contrast, F. Chen et al (2005) [12], Z. Zhang et al [13], and F. Chen et al (2009) [14] proposed reengineering methods for a legacy system that considered features, architecture, and ontology.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%