1995
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3800(94)00034-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model comparison for daylength as a function of latitude and day of year

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
223
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 344 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
223
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Daylength data (variables 1-3 above) were calculated for each environment according to the function described by Forsythe et al (1995). The slope of the change in daylength across days (DLse and DLst) was calculated as the first derivative of the function at specified days after planting (more on this below).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daylength data (variables 1-3 above) were calculated for each environment according to the function described by Forsythe et al (1995). The slope of the change in daylength across days (DLse and DLst) was calculated as the first derivative of the function at specified days after planting (more on this below).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daylength (dl) was calculated by taking into account latitude and date using the Forsythe et al (1995) model.…”
Section: Calibration Data Set: Multinet Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As fenofases (abscisão de folhas, brotamento, floração, frutificação e dispersão) foram correlacionadas com a precipitação e temperatura médias mensais do período de estudo (maio de 1995 a dezembro de 1997), com a precipitação e a temperatura médias mensais calculadas a partir da série histórica de janeiro de 1976 a dezembro de 2003 e o fotoperíodo médio mensal calculado de acordo com o modelo proposto por Forsythe et al (1995).…”
Section: Temperatura (ºC) Precipitação (Mm)unclassified