2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.is.2010.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model and architecture for open cross-media annotation and link services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An interesting idea that can be adopted to realise such a link service is the proposal of the general open cross-media annotation and link architecture by Signer and Norrie [24]. Similar to FAST, its basic idea is the separation of linking and annotation functionality from the annotated media.…”
Section: Open Cross-document Linkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An interesting idea that can be adopted to realise such a link service is the proposal of the general open cross-media annotation and link architecture by Signer and Norrie [24]. Similar to FAST, its basic idea is the separation of linking and annotation functionality from the annotated media.…”
Section: Open Cross-document Linkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the RSL model offers other features such as user management and support for overlapping hyperlinks via layering. To the best of our knowledge, the cross-media annotation and link architecture by Signer and Norrie [24] was the first to propose the concept of "extensibility on the visualisation layer" of a link service. Normally, when a link or annotation service is extended to support a new media type, also the user interface has to be extended to support the visualisation of the new media type.…”
Section: Open Cross-document Linkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Annotations can be done in many ways either manually coding the annotations into a text file or by using several annotation tools such as Greasemonkey scripts 2 and open annotation services [21]. We consider that annotation should be done by web developers, but since the use of annotation tools require little training they can be also mastered by experienced Web users.…”
Section: Fig 4 Annotation Process For Supporting Interoperability Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The annotation process can be done in many ways either manually coding the annotations into a text file or by using several annotation tools such as Greasemonkey scripts [11] and open annotation services [28] [29]. We consider that annotation should be done by web developers, but the use of annotation tools require little training and can be mastered by experienced Web users.…”
Section: Data Interoperabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%