IEEE GLOBECOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference 2008
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2008.ecp.1021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mobility Management Scheme with QoS Support for Heterogeneous Multihomed Mobile Nodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, we note that the method for measuring the TBIT metric does not consider the time consumed by erroneous transmissions (e.g., collisions), and due to this reason the measured number and duration of the idle time periods are not correct. Furthermore, in [38] the performance evaluation (i) does not consider the presence of heterogeneous voice codecs, (ii) does not consider the case in which STAs use different PHY rates, (iii) does not show any numerical result for the case in which background traffic is present and (iv) does not consider objective quality metrics as E-model [21]. All these conditions are commonly encountered in the vast majority of real WLAN scenarios, and could negatively affect the performance of a distributed CAC scheme.…”
Section: Vertical Handover Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, we note that the method for measuring the TBIT metric does not consider the time consumed by erroneous transmissions (e.g., collisions), and due to this reason the measured number and duration of the idle time periods are not correct. Furthermore, in [38] the performance evaluation (i) does not consider the presence of heterogeneous voice codecs, (ii) does not consider the case in which STAs use different PHY rates, (iii) does not show any numerical result for the case in which background traffic is present and (iv) does not consider objective quality metrics as E-model [21]. All these conditions are commonly encountered in the vast majority of real WLAN scenarios, and could negatively affect the performance of a distributed CAC scheme.…”
Section: Vertical Handover Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A step forward towards SIP-managed multihoming is presented in [21]. The authors propose an association scheme between the SIP URI of a user and its multiple IP addresses (each associated to one network interface) managed by the SIP server.…”
Section: Vertical Handover Executionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A step forward towards SIP-managed multihoming is in [15]. The authors propose an association scheme between the SIP URI of a user and its multiple IP addresses (each associated to one network interface) managed by the SIP server.…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Unified Mobility Scheme (UMS) for multihomed mobile nodes is presented in [155]. This mobility solution uses SIP for multihoming support and location management.…”
Section: M4: Multimedia Mobility Managermentioning
confidence: 99%