1997
DOI: 10.1080/1047322x.1997.10390029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mobile Exposure Chamber for Challenge Tests to the Human Respiratory Tract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Studies were categorized by the quality of blinding used: double-or single-blind studies that also included an odorous masking agent to prevent identification of the stimuli (Table I), [21][22][23][24][25][26] double-blind studies without masking (Table II), 11,12,[15][16][17][18][19][27][28][29][30][31][32] single-blind studies without masking (Table III), 13,14,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] and open-label studies or studies with unclear blinding (see Table E1 in the Online Repository at www.jacionline.org). 10,[45][46][47] Studies using olfactory masking agents or nose clips Three studies testing 70 chemically sensitive participants incorporated blinding and an olfactory mask and failed to show any significant effects on subjects with MCS after provocation with chemicals.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Studies were categorized by the quality of blinding used: double-or single-blind studies that also included an odorous masking agent to prevent identification of the stimuli (Table I), [21][22][23][24][25][26] double-blind studies without masking (Table II), 11,12,[15][16][17][18][19][27][28][29][30][31][32] single-blind studies without masking (Table III), 13,14,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] and open-label studies or studies with unclear blinding (see Table E1 in the Online Repository at www.jacionline.org). 10,[45][46][47] Studies using olfactory masking agents or nose clips Three studies testing 70 chemically sensitive participants incorporated blinding and an olfactory mask and failed to show any significant effects on subjects with MCS after provocation with chemicals.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%