A Mixed Comparison of Interventions for Kinesiophobia in Individuals With Musculoskeletal Pain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Huang, Jialu; Xu, Yining; Xuan, Rongrong; Baker, Julien S.; Gu, Yaodong

doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.886015

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 100 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Accordingly, clinicians managing people with post-COVID pain should listen to the patient's history for their thoughts, feelings, and behaviors that indicate either fear of movement, rumination, magnification of the threat value of pain, or a sense of helplessness. Treatments, including cognitive behavioral interventions, are recommended for the management of kinesiophobia caused by musculoskeletal pain; however, psychological interventions, such as coping strategies, are also potentially applicable [58]. Kamonseki et al reported that manual therapy strategies could also be equally effective as other cognitive interventions for managing cognitive maladaptative behaviors such as fear avoidance, kinesiophobia, and pain catastrophizing, again, in people with musculoskeletal pain conditions [59].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Association of Kinesiophobia with Catastrophism and Sensitization-Associated Symptoms in COVID-19 Survivors with Post-COVID Pain

Herrero-Montes

Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas

Ferrer-Pargada

et al. 2023

Diagnostics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pain symptoms after the acute phase of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) are present in almost 50% of COVID-19 survivors. The presence of kinesiophobia is a risk factor which may promote and perpetuate pain. This study aimed to investigate variables associated with the presence of kinesiophobia in a sample of previously hospitalized COVID-19 survivors exhibiting post-COVID pain. An observational study was conducted in three urban hospitals in Spain, including one hundred and forty-six COVID-19 survivors with post-COVID pain. Demographic (age, weight, height), clinical (intensity and duration of pain), psychological (anxiety level, depressive level, sleep quality), cognitive (catastrophizing), sensitization-associated symptoms, and health-related quality of life variables were collected in 146 survivors with post-COVID pain, as well as whether they exhibited kinesiophobia. Stepwise multiple linear regression models were conducted to identify variables significantly associated with kinesiophobia. Patients were assessed a mean of 18.8 (SD 1.8) months after hospital discharge. Kinesiophobia levels were positively associated with anxiety levels (r: 0.356, p < 0.001), depression levels (r: 0.306, p < 0.001), sleep quality (r: 0.288, p < 0.001), catastrophism (r: 0.578, p < 0.001), and sensitization-associated symptoms (r: 0.450, p < 0.001). The stepwise regression analysis revealed that 38.1% of kinesiophobia variance was explained by catastrophism (r2 adj: 0.329, B = 0.416, t = 8.377, p < 0.001) and sensitization-associated symptoms (r2 adj: 0.381, B = 0.130, t = 3.585, p < 0.001). Kinesiophobia levels were associated with catastrophism and sensitization-associated symptoms in previously hospitalized COVID-19 survivors with post-COVID pain. Identification of patients at a higher risk of developing a higher level of kinesiophobia, associated with post-COVID pain symptoms, could lead to better therapeutic strategies.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Association of Kinesiophobia with Catastrophism and Sensitization-Associated Symptoms in COVID-19 Survivors with Post-COVID Pain

Herrero-Montes

Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas

Ferrer-Pargada

et al. 2023

Diagnostics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“… 59 This is supported by the results of a recent network meta-analysis that showed that the use of general exercises to keep individuals active may be inappropriate in the presence of kinesiophobia induced by musculoskeletal pain. 60 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Specific versus general exercise programme in adults with subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomised controlled trial

Gutiérrez Espinoza,

Araya-Quintanilla,

Pinto-Concha

et al. 2023

BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesCurrent evidence on the clinical effectiveness about the different types of exercises in the subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) remains controversial. This study aims to compare the short-term (at 5 weeks) effects of a specific exercise programme with a general exercise programme on shoulder function in adults with SIS.MethodsIn total, 52 adults with SIS were randomly allocated to 5 weeks to perform specific exercises (experimental group, n=26) or general exercises (control group, n=26). The primary outcome was change in shoulder function, it was assessed using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) from baseline to 5 weeks. Secondary end points included changes in upper limb function (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire), pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale (VAS)) and kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK)).ResultsAll participants completed the trial. The between-group differences at 5 weeks were: SPADI, 13.5 points (95% CI: 4.3 to 15.6; ƞ2=0.22; p=0.001); DASH, 10.1 points (95% CI: 5.6 to 15.2; ƞ2=0.27; p<0.001); VAS at rest, 0.2 cm (95% CI: 0.1 to 0.3; ƞ2=0.07; p=0.553); VAS on movement, 1.7 cm (95% CI: 0.9 to 2.2; ƞ2=0.24; p<0.001); and TSK, 16.3 points (95% CI: 13.2 to 15.3; ƞ2=0.33; p<0.001). All differences favoured the experimental group and effect sizes were medium to large for most outcomes. Mediation analyses showed that the effect of the specific exercises on shoulder function was mediated by kinesiophobia (β=2.800; 95% CI: 1.063 to 4.907) and pain on movement (β= −0.690; 95% CI: −1.176 to −0.271).ConclusionIn adults with SIS, specific exercises may have a larger effect than general exercises. However, most differences did not reach the minimum threshold to be considered clinically important and the evidence to support exercise as standard treatment warrant further study.Trial registration numberBrazilian Registry of Clinical Trials UTN number U111-1245-7878. Registered on 17 January 2020 (https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-4d5zcg).

show abstract

“…27 Suer et al, Huang et al, and Watson et al agreed with the finding that that kinesiophobia is an excellent specific psychological tool to assess for the readiness to return to sports in athletes. [31][32][33] The PCS is used to assess the magnitude of pain catastrophizing thoughts (exaggeration of the negative threat value of pain) one engages in and was originally developed for the general population experiencing chronic pain. 28 Total scores range from 0 to 52 with a higher number indicating a greater pain catastrophizing tendency.…”

Section: Fear-avoidance Kinesiophobia and Pain Catastrophizingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Longitudinal Validation of a Specific Measure of Fear Avoidance in Athletes: Predicting Time from Injury to Return to Sports Competition

Tito¹,

Porter²,

Castonguay³

et al. 2023

JPR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose We developed the Athlete Fear Avoidance Questionnaire (AFAQ) to measure fear avoidance in athletes. Previous fear avoidance scales were developed for the general population and have demonstrated significant predictive capabilities regarding rehabilitation. No research to date has examined the association between athlete fear avoidance as measured by the AFAQ and the rehabilitation time in athletes. Patients and Methods Fifty-nine athletes who were injured during sport season participated in the study (40 males and 19 females). At injury onset, all participants completed self-report functional questionnaires. In addition, we measured multiple aspects of fear avoidance including athlete fear avoidance (AFAQ), kinesiophobia (TSK), and pain catastrophizing (PCS). Finally, we assessed pain severity and interference, as well as depression. Once the athletes were able to return to competition all participants answered the questionnaires again. Pearson correlations and a regression analysis were used to identify relationships between function, psychological variables, pain, and return to competition time. Results The AFAQ yielded the strongest correlation with return to competition time ( r =0.544, p <0.001). In addition, function at initial injury time and pain interference were also significantly correlated with return to competition time ( r =0.442, p <0.001 and r =0.356, p =0.006 respectively). Athlete fear-avoidance combined with function at the time of injury explained 34% of the variance of return to competition time in the multivariate regression model ( p <0.001). Conclusion Athlete fear-avoidance as measured by the AFAQ is associated with rehabilitation time and returning to competition in injured athletes. Psychosocial factors including athlete fear avoidance may explain why some athletes take longer to rehabilitate than others and should be evaluated in athletes who are taking longer than anticipated to complete their rehabilitation. Reducing athlete fear avoidance may facilitate rehabilitation in future studies.

show abstract

A Mixed Comparison of Interventions for Kinesiophobia in Individuals With Musculoskeletal Pain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Cited by 6 publications

References 100 publications

Association of Kinesiophobia with Catastrophism and Sensitization-Associated Symptoms in COVID-19 Survivors with Post-COVID Pain

Association of Kinesiophobia with Catastrophism and Sensitization-Associated Symptoms in COVID-19 Survivors with Post-COVID Pain

Specific versus general exercise programme in adults with subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomised controlled trial

Longitudinal Validation of a Specific Measure of Fear Avoidance in Athletes: Predicting Time from Injury to Return to Sports Competition

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About