Specific versus general exercise programme in adults with subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomised controlled trial

Abstract

ObjectivesCurrent evidence on the clinical effectiveness about the different types of exercises in the subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) remains controversial. This study aims to compare the short-term (at 5 weeks) effects of a specific exercise programme with a general exercise programme on shoulder function in adults with SIS.MethodsIn total, 52 adults with SIS were randomly allocated to 5 weeks to perform specific exercises (experimental group, n=26) or general exercises (control group, n=26). The primary outcome was change in shoulder function, it was assessed using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) from baseline to 5 weeks. Secondary end points included changes in upper limb function (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire), pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale (VAS)) and kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK)).ResultsAll participants completed the trial. The between-group differences at 5 weeks were: SPADI, 13.5 points (95% CI: 4.3 to 15.6; ƞ2=0.22; p=0.001); DASH, 10.1 points (95% CI: 5.6 to 15.2; ƞ2=0.27; p<0.001); VAS at rest, 0.2 cm (95% CI: 0.1 to 0.3; ƞ2=0.07; p=0.553); VAS on movement, 1.7 cm (95% CI: 0.9 to 2.2; ƞ2=0.24; p<0.001); and TSK, 16.3 points (95% CI: 13.2 to 15.3; ƞ2=0.33; p<0.001). All differences favoured the experimental group and effect sizes were medium to large for most outcomes. Mediation analyses showed that the effect of the specific exercises on shoulder function was mediated by kinesiophobia (β=2.800; 95% CI: 1.063 to 4.907) and pain on movement (β= −0.690; 95% CI: −1.176 to −0.271).ConclusionIn adults with SIS, specific exercises may have a larger effect than general exercises. However, most differences did not reach the minimum threshold to be considered clinically important and the evidence to support exercise as standard treatment warrant further study.Trial registration numberBrazilian Registry of Clinical Trials UTN number U111-1245-7878. Registered on 17 January 2020 (https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-4d5zcg).

Is exercise therapy the right treatment for rotator cuff‐related shoulder pain? Uncertainties, theory, and practice

“…Mediation analysis is an empirical method of ascertaining how a treatment causes an outcome (Lee et al, 2021); for example, how does resistance exercise reduce shoulder pain? Mediation analyses investigating the causal mechanisms of exercise for shoulder pain are scarce and only two could be identified at the time of writing (Gutierrez Espinoza et al, 2023;Hotta et al, 2022), of which, both warrant discussion. Hotta et al (2022) conducted a secondary mediation analysis of an RCT which compared general periscapular muscle strengthening exercises to general periscapular muscle strengthening plus scapular stabilisation exercises (Hotta et al, 2020(Hotta et al, , 2022.…”