A Mini Review: Challenge & Issues in Outdoor Recreation-Outdoor Competency Coaches

Abstract

The competency of Outdoor Recreation Coaches continues to be a debate among the community. This is because, issues pertaining to competency continue to be said as a result of various incidents and accidents in Outdoor Recreation and Outdoor Education activities. Today, various organizations, operators and operators of Outdoor and Education Recreation activities express their commitment to organize various promotions of challenging and enjoyable activities. But as far as the competency level capabilities of outdoor recreation coaches are really competent? Is there any evaluation or measurement instrument that is truly explicit in determining the competency of Outdoor Recreation coaches in Malaysia. Therefore, this article will peel off the issues and challenges faced in relation to the competency of Outdoor Recreation and Outdoor Education coaches.

Validity and Reliability Mal-Unity Module toward The High School Students in Batang Padang District Perak

“…The r-value for the validity of the Language experts shows r=.93. This is consistent with the values suggested by Said et al (2021); Hashim and Raj (2018), indicating that good and acceptable validity values are .70 and above. Therefore, the results of this study clearly indicate that, for both the expert validity process and language expert validity process, the development of the Unity Module (MAL-UNITY) records good and acceptable validity values After going through the validation process, the next process is the reliability process of the module.…”

“…Overall, the expert validity findings for the development of the MAL-Unity module show a value of r=.91. According to Said et al (2021), validity values of 0.70 and above are considered acceptable. This is also supported by Hashim and Raj (2018), who state that good and acceptable validity values are >.70 and above.…”

“…In order to determine the reliability value of the module, the Cronbach Alpha (α) value is used to determine the reliability of the module developed by the researcher. According to Said (2021), the reliability of a good instrument is between 0.70 and .99 (best). Among other things, according to Bonet and Wright (2014) explain the interpretation of Cronbach Alpha scores as in Table 3.1 below.…”