2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.4710992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A microfluidics approach towards high-throughput pathogen removal from blood using margination

Abstract: Sepsis is an adverse systemic inflammatory response caused by microbial infection in blood. This paper reports a simple microfluidic approach for intrinsic, non-specific removal of both microbes and inflammatory cellular components (platelets and leukocytes) from whole blood, inspired by the invivo phenomenon of leukocyte margination. As blood flows through a narrow microchannel (20 × 20 µm), deformable red blood cells (RBCs) migrate axially to the channel centre, resulting in margination of other cell types (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RBCs loss their deformability, which leads to block microcirculation of vital organs. 48,49 To determine the biomechanical properties of malaria-infected RBCs, several methods including mechanicalbased approaches [48][49][50][51][52][53] and electrical impedance-based approaches 54,55 have been employed by using a microfluidic device. As a clinical demonstration using the proposed method, blood sample was collected from an in vivo malaria-infected mouse at indicated times.…”
Section: B Quantitative Evaluations Of the Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RBCs loss their deformability, which leads to block microcirculation of vital organs. 48,49 To determine the biomechanical properties of malaria-infected RBCs, several methods including mechanicalbased approaches [48][49][50][51][52][53] and electrical impedance-based approaches 54,55 have been employed by using a microfluidic device. As a clinical demonstration using the proposed method, blood sample was collected from an in vivo malaria-infected mouse at indicated times.…”
Section: B Quantitative Evaluations Of the Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As this lateral force is smaller for bacterial cells ($0.25-1 lm), these are relatively marginated, similar to the strategy adopted in Ref. 21 ( Figure 1). Device manufacturing was performed by Epigem (Redcar, UK).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…6 Several microfluidic devices have been reported for the continuous extraction of bacteria from blood, some relying on active forces, 14,15 on selective lysis 16 while others exploit label-free passive hydrodynamic methods. [17][18][19][20][21] However, given that shear stress is a known factor for mRNA deregulation in human 22 and bacterial cells, 23 it is critical to ensure that microfluidic processing does not impact upon the RNA expression profile. In this paper, we investigated the impact of microfluidic processing on the RNA expression of bacteria in blood, comparing on-chip sample processing to traditional benchtop methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to characterize microfluidic technologies is by virtue of their operational flow rate and experimental duration. There is a whole gamut of devices which operate at high flow fluid rates for short durations, such as high-throughput cell sorters 2 , inertial-force devices 3 and droplet-based microsystems 4 . Such devices commonly use non-adherent cells, or adherent cells maintained in suspension, because cells are meant to have short residence durations within the device.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%