2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.07.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A microfluidic device for label-free detection of Escherichia coli in drinking water using positive dielectrophoretic focusing, capturing, and impedance measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be evidenced in the growing number of published articles and citations reflected in Web of Science (WOS). This emergent trend is also evident for bacteria detection and concentration ( Figure 1 ) since several research groups reported the simultaneous measure of the concentrated bacteria in a single piece of equipment [ 14 , 30 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can be evidenced in the growing number of published articles and citations reflected in Web of Science (WOS). This emergent trend is also evident for bacteria detection and concentration ( Figure 1 ) since several research groups reported the simultaneous measure of the concentrated bacteria in a single piece of equipment [ 14 , 30 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This generates an urgent necessity for fast, accurate, cost effective and more accessible technologies [ 25 ]. Due to this scenario, new methods of fast monitoring and characterization have been explored based on electrical properties of cells or particles [ 29 , 30 ]. In this context, electric field-based separation approaches are attracting interest because of their fastness, potential for automation, simplicity, portability, miniaturization, massive parallelization and labour-saving characteristics [ 10 , 11 , 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, integration of the developed biosensors with applicable pre-processing and post-processing techniques is of great importance for practical application on field. To date, microfluidics-based techniques have been widely integrated with biosensors for pre-concentration of bacteria cells, taking advantage of size difference [103,104], electrostatic trapping [105], gravity [106], dielectrophoresis [107][108][109] and ion-concentration polarization [110]. However, these techniques also have several limitations, for example, the limited volume of sample throughput, length of time required to complete the process and the requirement for relatively clean samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last 2 decades, much effort has focused on resolving this issue by development of sample pretreatment methods that can be integrated with biosensors. These approaches include microfluidic separation (Zuo and others ; Packard and others ; Clime and others ; Kim and others ; Lee and others ; Luka and others ; Gashti and others ), nanoparticle separation (Varshney and Li ; Kwon and others ; Wang and others ), magnetic relaxation switching (Chen and others ), dielectrophoresis (Cheng and others ; Packard and others ; Wang and others ; Yang ; Hamada and others ; Couniot and others ; Kim and others ; Fernandez and others ), immunochromatography (Vyas and others ), acoustofluidic sorting (Li and others ), ferrofluidic manipulation (Kose and others ), or hydrodynamic focusing (Clime and others ). Although not reviewed in detail here, sample pretreatment is a major focus of biosensor research labs and the primary challenges are minimizing destructive sampling, need for pumps, energy, and use of exogenous chemicals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%