2005
DOI: 10.1007/11596356_105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Microeconomics-Based Fuzzy QoS Unicast Routing Scheme in NGI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the following inequalities satisfied [9]: {nu m*n* 2 nu mn UU m*n* > UU m*n (19) <am *, bn *> is a solution under Nash equilibrium, where m * and n * represent certain m and n respectively. If there are zero or more than one solutions under Nash equilibrium, Pareto superiority [13] of the network provider utility and the user utility under the corresponding strategy pairs need to be compared, and then the one with the strongest Pareto superiority is selected.…”
Section: Gaming Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the following inequalities satisfied [9]: {nu m*n* 2 nu mn UU m*n* > UU m*n (19) <am *, bn *> is a solution under Nash equilibrium, where m * and n * represent certain m and n respectively. If there are zero or more than one solutions under Nash equilibrium, Pareto superiority [13] of the network provider utility and the user utility under the corresponding strategy pairs need to be compared, and then the one with the strongest Pareto superiority is selected.…”
Section: Gaming Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed scheme, the proposed microeconomics based fuzzy unicast QoS routing scheme in [24], and the unicast routing scheme based on Dijkstra algorithm [8] have been simulated on some physical and virtual network topologies, called A, G and D schemes below for short. Compared with A scheme, G scheme takes imprecise network status and both-win of the network provider utility and the user utility into account but does not consider imprecise user QoS requirement and ABC.…”
Section: Simulation Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%