“…Jung et al (2005) reported a good correlation between sectioned slices of root filled maxillary teeth and their respective micro‐CT cross‐section images, and showed that micro‐CT enabled to evaluate any level of the root and to visualize and calculate the volume of filling materials and voids as a 3D single object or in separate. Since this study, micro‐CT has been used to evaluate different materials and techniques regarding their ability to fill lateral canals (Fragachan et al, 2018) and experimental internal resorption cavities (Keleş et al, 2014a; Tek & Turker, 2020) but, mostly, to calculate the percentage volume of the sealer and gutta‐percha, as well as, the amount of voids and interfacial gaps (Figures 35 and 36) in permanent teeth (Table 1) or printed replicas (Figures 7, 8 and 9; Holmes et al, 2021). Overall, it has been reported that no filling technique produced void‐free fillings and the presence of voids was associated with spreader tracts, quality of canal preparation, operator expertise, filling technique, and consistency, volume, and polymerization shrinkage of sealers (Hammad et al, 2009; Keleş et al, 2014c; Zogheib et al, 2012; Figures 37 and 38).…”