17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2014.6958199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A methodology for calibrating microscopic simulation for modeling traffic flow under incidents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first stage referred to a reasonable adjustment of the input data (desired speeds) in order to minimize the divergence from the field data (BT travel times), while the second stage referred to the selection of the optimal parameter set. In order to conclude to the optimal parameter set, a certain zone of suitable parameters' values was determined based on Xin (2013) and Rompis et al (2014). The optimum values were selected based on a repetitive process of trial and error in the delimited zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first stage referred to a reasonable adjustment of the input data (desired speeds) in order to minimize the divergence from the field data (BT travel times), while the second stage referred to the selection of the optimal parameter set. In order to conclude to the optimal parameter set, a certain zone of suitable parameters' values was determined based on Xin (2013) and Rompis et al (2014). The optimum values were selected based on a repetitive process of trial and error in the delimited zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other papers by Gomes et al (2004) and Rompis et al (2014), referring also to highway model calibration, conclude to values for CC1 around 1.5 while concerning the CC2 parameter, Rompis et al…”
Section: Second Stage Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Rahman and Mattingly found that the car-following values proposed in prior studies for incident modeling produced better results relative to macroscopic measures compared with the default values (23). Rompis et al developed a method for Vissim calibration based on kinematic queuing theory (24). The incident was modeled by coding a traffic signal in Vissim.…”
Section: Is Segment I Average Speed < 35 Mph?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, researchers have been focusing on using microscopic traffic simulation to quantify IID (19,20). The problem with simulation-based estimation of IID is that the model has to be well-calibrated and validated for incident and incident-free scenarios during peak and off-peak hours (21). A simulation model calibrated for normal traffic conditions would not be helpful unless it is validated for incident scenarios, which would make model calibration and validation cumbersome and time-consuming.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%