A methodological study on the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods in cognitive interviewing for cross‐cultural adaptation

Jia, Miao; Gu, Yu; Chen, Yanhua; Tu, Jinyi; Liu, Yue; Lu, Huiqi; Huang, Shiyun; Li, Jinjun; Zhou, Hongzhen

doi:10.1002/nop2.1121

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 62 publications

(60 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Then, the recommendations were sent to a focus group for further discussion. The focus group consisted of seven participants: one facilitator, one researcher of this study (HQL), two researchers of a parallel study, 21 two clinical nurses, and one observer. The three researchers discussed the recommended changes under the guidance of the facilitator, and once the suggested changes were confirmed, the corresponding probes for that item in the protocol would be modified as well.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Post-Stroke Checklist into Mandarin: A Cognitive Interview Study

Jia¹,

Lu²,

Olutoye³

et al. 2022

NDT

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This study aimed to translate the Post-stroke Checklist into Mandarin, validate its content, and cross-culturally adapt the Mandarin version of the Post-stroke Checklist (M-PSC) in line with expert review and cognitive interviewing. Patients and Methods After translating into Mandarin, the M-PSC was modified and content validated using expert review, which resulted in a pilot version for cognitive interviewing among stroke survivors inclusive of subjects from an outpatient unit (n = 7), a rehabilitation department using traditional Chinese medicine (n = 10), and a community (n = 10). The interviews were transcribed and analyzed according to the four-stage cognitive model. A set of nine practice rounds where the number of rounds of iteration was determined based on the saturation of information was conducted. Data analysis was performed concurrently with data collection. Recommendations for changes to the M-PSC were made based on the analyses in the iteration. Results We successfully developed an initial M-PSC, back-translated it into English, reviewed the discrepancies and performed a three-step expert review to modify the M-PSC and validate its excellent content. Twenty-seven interviews were carried out, and a wide range of sources of error primarily related to the comprehension, retrieval of information, and judgment was reported, and each item of the M-PSC was rectified accordingly. Conclusion The Post-stroke Checklist was translated into Mandarin and cross-culturally adapted based on expert review and cognitive interviewing. Adaptations were made to support that the Mandarin version can be implemented in clinical practice for long-term post-stroke care.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Post-Stroke Checklist into Mandarin: A Cognitive Interview Study

Jia¹,

Lu²,

Olutoye³

et al. 2022

NDT

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The stopping criteria for cognitive interviews will be when our analyses reveal saturation in themes (e.g., no new feedback on items, feedback converges). As others have previously noted, cognitive interviewing sample sizes may not be sufficient to achieve complete saturation and stopping criteria may operate under a principle of diminishing returns (52)(53)(54). In cases where feedback conflicts or new feedback is of minimal value, we will discuss items as a team and consult additional experts as needed to make a decision on continuing additional interviews.…”

Section: Cognitive Interviewing Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigating implementation of school health policies through a health equity lens: A measures development study protocol

McLoughlin

Walsh‐Bailey

Singleton

et al. 2022

Front. Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundSchool-based policies that ensure provision of nutrition, physical activity, and other health-promoting resources and opportunities are essential in mitigating health disparities among underserved populations. Measuring the implementation of such policies is imperative to bridge the gap between policy and practice. Unfortunately, limited practical, psychometrically strong measures of school policy implementation exist. Few available explicitly focus on the issues of equity and social justice as a key component of implementation, which may result in underassessment of the equity implications of policy implementation. The purpose of this study is to develop equity-focused measures in collaboration with practitioners, researchers, and other key implementation partners that will facilitate evaluation of policy implementation determinants (i.e., barriers and facilitators), processes, and outcomes.MethodsWe will actively seek engagement from practitioners, researchers, and advocacy partners (i.e., stakeholders) who have expertise in school health policy throughout each phase of this project. We propose a multi-phase, 1-year project comprising the following steps: (1) selection of relevant constructs from guiding frameworks related to health equity and implementation science; (2) initial measure development, including expert feedback on draft items; (3) pilot cognitive testing with representatives from key target populations (i.e., school administrators, teachers, food service staff, and students and parents/guardians); and (4) measure refinement based on testing and assessment of pragmatic properties. These steps will allow us to establish initial face and content validity of a set of instruments that can undergo psychometric testing in future studies to assess their reliability and validity.DiscussionCompletion of this project will result in several school policy implementation measurement tools which can be readily used by practitioners and researchers to evaluate policy implementation through a health equity lens. This will provide opportunities for better assessment and accountability of policies that aim to advance health equity among school-aged children and their families.Trial registrationOpen Science Framework Registration doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/736ZU.

show abstract

A methodological study on the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods in cognitive interviewing for cross‐cultural adaptation

Jia

Gu²,

Chen

et al. 2021

Nursing Open

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Guidelines for the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of survey questionnaires have been published, and cognitive interviewing is recommended to evaluate survey questionnaires and improve their design (Willis, 2005). However, although cognitive interviews might detect the presence of problems, they cannot identify the source of the problems and quantify them. Without hard evidence concerning the best way to conduct cognitive interviews, the strategies applied have varied from person to person, and different analysis methods have been used based on qualitative methodologies. Studies on the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods in cognitive interviewing for cross-cultural adaptation are needed (Andersen et al., 2014). | BACKG ROU N DCognitive interviewing represents an interdisciplinary fusion of the survey methodology and cognitive psychology. This method may

show abstract

A methodological study on the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods in cognitive interviewing for cross‐cultural adaptation

Cited by 4 publications

References 62 publications

Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Post-Stroke Checklist into Mandarin: A Cognitive Interview Study

Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Post-Stroke Checklist into Mandarin: A Cognitive Interview Study

Investigating implementation of school health policies through a health equity lens: A measures development study protocol

A methodological study on the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods in cognitive interviewing for cross‐cultural adaptation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About