2019
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method to Project Future Impacts From Threats and Conservation on the Probability of Extinction for North American Migratory Monarch (Danaus plexippus) Populations

Abstract: Voorhies et al. Future Impacts on Monarchs provides a tractable and updatable tool that includes multiple types of information and the associated uncertainty of drivers, population impacts, and risk of extinction. For monarchs, this tool will be critical for incorporating the best scientific and commercial information available in the upcoming listing decision.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data and field‐scale mortality estimates from the present study can augment expert opinion recently used to elucidate the potential impact of insecticide use on recovery of the monarch butterfly (Voorhies et al 2019). We estimated high monarch larval mortality rates 0 to 15 m downwind of maize and soybean fields treated with foliar insecticide applications; however, these findings are not relevant for all monarch habitat that is in close proximity to crop fields.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Data and field‐scale mortality estimates from the present study can augment expert opinion recently used to elucidate the potential impact of insecticide use on recovery of the monarch butterfly (Voorhies et al 2019). We estimated high monarch larval mortality rates 0 to 15 m downwind of maize and soybean fields treated with foliar insecticide applications; however, these findings are not relevant for all monarch habitat that is in close proximity to crop fields.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Our overall approach took advantage of existing data collected by the States and other management partners within a widely accepted monitoring framework and therefore did not rely on expert elicitation or large-scale extrapolations from highly detailed but small-scale studies and data sets (e.g. McGowan et al 2017, Voorhies et al 2019. Other analyses and predictive approaches may have also addressed the information needs and supported the decision process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These spatial subdivisions often, though not necessarily, follow dividing lines for representation units for the species and there is no specific guidance on how to subdivide a species' range into spatial subunits (Smith et al 2018). We de termined that geographical and ecological differences across the range were aspects of the subspecies' biology that needed to be represented (Smith et al 2018, USFWS 2018. Using a separate encounter-only point similarity analysis, we divided the range into 7 analysis units that served as representation units under the 3 Rs framework (USFWS 2018).…”
Section: Study Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, there has been little monitoring of the current status of these geographic units to inform the starting conditions for a population projection model. In place of observationally derived empirical models that predict future species condition, expert opinion and professional judgment are appropriate and scientifically supported approaches (Morgan, 2014) often used to fill in the gaps in SSAs (e.g., Voorhies, Szymanski, Nail, & Fidino, 2019). Expert judgment can be obtained through formal elicitation procedures (e.g., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2011; Drescher et al, 2013; Morgan, 2014, Fleishman, Burgman, Runge, Schick, & Kraus, 2016) in which experts are selected based on a screening process, are prepped for the elicitation, and are facilitated through the elicitation process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%