2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7825(01)00189-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method of substructuring large-scale computational micromechanical problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Zohdi et al [25], a specimen can be computationally tested to permit the solution to the elastic problem for determining the stress and strain micro fields. Solving the system of equations shown in Equation (8) determines the constants for the matrix of elasticity.…”
Section: The Plane Stress (Pt) and Plane Strain (Ps) Hypotheses And Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Zohdi et al [25], a specimen can be computationally tested to permit the solution to the elastic problem for determining the stress and strain micro fields. Solving the system of equations shown in Equation (8) determines the constants for the matrix of elasticity.…”
Section: The Plane Stress (Pt) and Plane Strain (Ps) Hypotheses And Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16, 32 and 64 particle samples (the responses differed from one another, on average, by less than 1 %), we selected the 20-particle microstructures for further tests. 4 Following Zohdi et al [64], we then simulated 512 different samples, each time with a different random distribution of 20 nonintersecting particles occupying 22 % of the volume. Consistent with the previous test's mesh densities, we found that beyond approximately 2344 DOF per particle (24 × 24 × 24 mesh or 9 × 9 × 9 trilinear hexahedra or 46875 DOF per test sample), the numerical simulations were insensitive to further mesh refinements.…”
Section: Size Effects In Computational Materials Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work was an extension to their previous paper [31] in which the fine scale discretisation error was ignored. The natural error between the exact solution u and the coarsest scale solution u (0,h) is defined by [43,44]:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%