2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0305-0548(03)00189-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for solving the minimization of the maximum number of open stacks problem within a cutting process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
26

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
24
0
26
Order By: Relevance
“…For the purpose of comparison, the criteria adopted in this study were the same as those adopted by [5] and [18]. As [3,5] used quantitative methods and this work adopted the qualitative methodology, the data were converted to the In the particular case, as the criteria 'Stakeholders' And 'Customer requirement value' have more than one customer by punctuating the same requirement, the arithmetic mean between the scores indicated by those clients for the classification represented in table 2 was considered. 4.…”
Section: D1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the purpose of comparison, the criteria adopted in this study were the same as those adopted by [5] and [18]. As [3,5] used quantitative methods and this work adopted the qualitative methodology, the data were converted to the In the particular case, as the criteria 'Stakeholders' And 'Customer requirement value' have more than one customer by punctuating the same requirement, the arithmetic mean between the scores indicated by those clients for the classification represented in table 2 was considered. 4.…”
Section: D1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common method is the use of metaheuristics that are algorithms used to solve optimization problems. Becceneri [3] say that metaheuristics is algorithmic tool, which can be applied to different optimization problems, with relatively small modifications, in order to make them adaptable to a specific problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower bounds are often based on the co-demand graph G which has been defined in the literature in [1]. The nodes of G are associated to orders and an edge (i, j) is added if and only if orders i and j share at least one product.…”
Section: Preprocessing and Lower Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nodes of G are associated to orders and an edge (i, j) is added if and only if orders i and j share at least one product. Several lower bounds can be defined from this graph, and we use the size of a clique obtained as a minor of G [1] by edge contraction as it appeared the most effective in our experimentation. These bounds may also be used during search on the problem restricted to P − S by taking into account the current open orders.…”
Section: Preprocessing and Lower Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the problem is also known to be NP-Hard (Linhares & Yanasse, 2002) and therefore, difficult to be solved exactly. In Becceneri et al (2004) it is presented the best heuristic, up to now, in terms of the quantity of open stacks, despite a much worst running time than Yuen (1995) and our new heuristic presented here. Metaheuristics solutions for the MOSP were also suggested (Faggioli & Bentivoglio, 1998;Fink & Voss, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%