2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2018.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for monthly mapping of wet and dry snow using Sentinel-1 and MODIS: Application to a Himalayan river basin

Abstract: Satellite Remote Sensing, with both optical and SAR instruments, can provide distributed observations of snow cover over extended and inaccessible areas. Both instruments are complementary, but there have been limited attempts at combining their measurements. We describe a novel approach to produce monthly maps of dry and wet snow areas through application of data fusion techniques to MODIS fractional snow cover and Sentinel-1 wet snow mask, facilitated by Google Earth Engine. The method is demonstrated in a 5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RS based snow cover and its properties have direct use as input to snowmelt runoff models (Jain et al, 2009;Prasad and Roy, 2005;Thakur et al, 2009;Aggarwal et al, 2013;Thakur, 2014;Wulf et al, 2016), and as validation and data assimilation in process based hydrological models (Naha et al, 2016;Agarwal et al, 2016). The optical data is capable of giving good quality snow cover maps, but synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data is able to provide, dry/wet snow and snow physical properties as well, due to penetration capability and sensitivity to snow wetness Venkataraman 2007, 2009;Thakur et al, 2012;Snapir et al, 2019). The only major limitation of SAR sensors is no penetration when snow is wet, less temporal resolution and operations in single wavelength (Hallikainen et al, 2001;Thakur et al, 2012).…”
Section: Snow Covermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RS based snow cover and its properties have direct use as input to snowmelt runoff models (Jain et al, 2009;Prasad and Roy, 2005;Thakur et al, 2009;Aggarwal et al, 2013;Thakur, 2014;Wulf et al, 2016), and as validation and data assimilation in process based hydrological models (Naha et al, 2016;Agarwal et al, 2016). The optical data is capable of giving good quality snow cover maps, but synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data is able to provide, dry/wet snow and snow physical properties as well, due to penetration capability and sensitivity to snow wetness Venkataraman 2007, 2009;Thakur et al, 2012;Snapir et al, 2019). The only major limitation of SAR sensors is no penetration when snow is wet, less temporal resolution and operations in single wavelength (Hallikainen et al, 2001;Thakur et al, 2012).…”
Section: Snow Covermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, information on snow depth is needed in order to check that the balance of snow accumulation and melt is correctly represented in the model [128]. For this purpose, further research to assess the potential of products such as dry/wet snow maps [169] is required.…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the size, remoteness, low population density, and extreme topographical variation of the Himalayan region prevent the establishment of widespread dense ground-based observations, efforts should be directed to strategically design, implement and maintain cost-efficient high elevation monitoring networks in test catchments that enable the validation and improvement of distributed data for meteorological (i.e., remote sensing products, re-analyses and regional climate models) and snow/ice variables (i.e., remote sensing images to derive glacier movement, debris thickness, etc.). While data quality is improved, proposals for the correction of current meteorological products can be found in the literature [4,29,80] as well as novel methods to infer snow/ice mass balance-related processes [168,169]. Where gauged flows are not available, the option to use remotely-sensed river discharges should be explored [181,182].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pollutant concentration was estimated by a contamination index based on snow reflectance [26][27][28]. The liquid water content could be obtained by water flux models incorporated within the 1-D snow cover model SNOWPACK [29]. By applying joint inversion using multispectral and hyperspectral data, the snowpack roughness can also be extracted [30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%