1963
DOI: 10.3109/rhe1.1963.9.issue-1-4.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method for Measuring Swelling of Hands and Feet: Part I Normal Variations and Applications in Inflammatory Joint Diseases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method of measuring volume has excellent reliability. 1,13 For each of the 3 visits, volume was recorded prior to heat application, immediately following 15-minute heat application, and at the end of the 30-minute therapy visit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method of measuring volume has excellent reliability. 1,13 For each of the 3 visits, volume was recorded prior to heat application, immediately following 15-minute heat application, and at the end of the 30-minute therapy visit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference of 20 ml in the result from the original volume of 1,000 cc for the acrylate block can be explained by the fact that the water was collected only over a 2-min period as specified in the procedure. Because the coefficient of variation for both volumeters was less than one per cent, the intra-volumeter reliability was considered sufficiently high enough for their use in this study 7,8) . Further, comparison of the two volumeters using a paired t test showed that the level of significance was 0.84 indicating a probability of less than 1%, so that the inter-volumeter reliability was sufficient for the author to accept that both volumeters were identical.…”
Section: Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%