1975
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8659(1975)104<245:amfeyc>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method for Estimating Year Class Strength from Abundance Data with Application to the Fishery of Green Bay, Lake Michigan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This inconsistent relationship between spawning stock biomass and α, coupled with the lack of a significant density dependent term in the KF-RW model, does not fit with previous research conclusions regarding rainbow smelt recruitment. Specifically, compensatory density dependence has been commonly observed in other populations of Great Lakes rainbow smelt, including cannibalism, poor egg survival at high densities, and intraspecific competition (Henderson and Nepszy, 1989;He and LaBar, 1994;McKenzie, 1964;Walter and Hoagman, 1975). Moreover, recent increases in α appear incongruous with the concomitant decreases in size structure and length at maturation we observed because smaller, younger smelt likely produce fewer eggs (Dunstall, 1980) and in many fish smaller mothers also produce eggs of poorer quality through maternal effects on egg size or larval characteristics (Berkeley et al, 2004;Olin et al, 2012).…”
Section: Recruitment Dynamics In Lake Michiganmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This inconsistent relationship between spawning stock biomass and α, coupled with the lack of a significant density dependent term in the KF-RW model, does not fit with previous research conclusions regarding rainbow smelt recruitment. Specifically, compensatory density dependence has been commonly observed in other populations of Great Lakes rainbow smelt, including cannibalism, poor egg survival at high densities, and intraspecific competition (Henderson and Nepszy, 1989;He and LaBar, 1994;McKenzie, 1964;Walter and Hoagman, 1975). Moreover, recent increases in α appear incongruous with the concomitant decreases in size structure and length at maturation we observed because smaller, younger smelt likely produce fewer eggs (Dunstall, 1980) and in many fish smaller mothers also produce eggs of poorer quality through maternal effects on egg size or larval characteristics (Berkeley et al, 2004;Olin et al, 2012).…”
Section: Recruitment Dynamics In Lake Michiganmentioning
confidence: 75%