2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for assessing infrastructure for CO2 utilization: A case study of Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent study, Karjunen et al (2017) studied the application of CO 2 capture, transport, and intermediate storage logistics for Finnish energy system based on renewable energy sources. The cost of biogenic CO 2 for utilization varied between 40 and 44 €/t,CO 2 depending on applied future scenario.…”
Section: Co 2 Removal Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent study, Karjunen et al (2017) studied the application of CO 2 capture, transport, and intermediate storage logistics for Finnish energy system based on renewable energy sources. The cost of biogenic CO 2 for utilization varied between 40 and 44 €/t,CO 2 depending on applied future scenario.…”
Section: Co 2 Removal Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karjunen et al [80] also studied the development of power-to-gas value chains in Finland using biogenic carbon sources. They used a node-based material balance tool, which monitors the carbon flow across the energy systems and estimated all the CCU related costs.…”
Section: Existing Optimization Models and Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capture of biogenic carbon dioxide from the outgoing flows from pulping is still a little studied subject (Leeson et al, 2017), but recent studies have found the application of BECCS in pulp mills technically feasible (IEAGHG, 2016;Kuparinen et al, 2019). Previous studies in this area have mainly focused on modeling of carbon capture integration in kraft pulp mill operation (Kuparinen et al, 2019;Onarheim et al, 2017a), estimation of costs (Fuss et al, 2018;IEAGHG, 2016;Karjunen et al, 2017;Onarheim et al, 2017b) or the possible scale or emission reduction potential (Leeson et al, 2017;Fuss et al, 2018;Kuparinen et al, 2019, IEA, 2020. The most studied capture method is the commercial monoethanolamine (MEA) post-combustion process (Karjunen et al, 2017;Leeson et al, 2017;Onarheim et al, 2017a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies in this area have mainly focused on modeling of carbon capture integration in kraft pulp mill operation (Kuparinen et al, 2019;Onarheim et al, 2017a), estimation of costs (Fuss et al, 2018;IEAGHG, 2016;Karjunen et al, 2017;Onarheim et al, 2017b) or the possible scale or emission reduction potential (Leeson et al, 2017;Fuss et al, 2018;Kuparinen et al, 2019, IEA, 2020. The most studied capture method is the commercial monoethanolamine (MEA) post-combustion process (Karjunen et al, 2017;Leeson et al, 2017;Onarheim et al, 2017a). Based on earlier estimates, the cost of CO 2 avoided in pulp mills ranges between 20 and 92 € per ton of CO 2 depending on the chosen processes and mill details (Fuss et al, 2018;IEAGHG, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%