2015
DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2015.159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method comparison of a food frequency questionnaire to measure folate, choline, betaine, vitamin C and carotenoids with 24-h dietary recalls in women of reproductive age

Abstract: The findings indicate that this FFQ estimated higher mean intakes for most nutrients. Pearson's correlation coefficients were comparable with previous research; however, the Bland-Altman plots suggest a high variability in mean nutrient estimates between the FFQ and 24-h. We recommend further investigation of the validity of this FFQ before use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FFQ tend to estimate higher mean intakes for most nutrients compared to the 24-hour recall [67]. In the two Swedish surveys, the regional FFQ study from Umeå [52] reported a mean dietary iron intake of 14.5 mg/day, while the nationwide 4 days food diary study [53] reported a significantly lower intake of 9.4 mg/day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FFQ tend to estimate higher mean intakes for most nutrients compared to the 24-hour recall [67]. In the two Swedish surveys, the regional FFQ study from Umeå [52] reported a mean dietary iron intake of 14.5 mg/day, while the nationwide 4 days food diary study [53] reported a significantly lower intake of 9.4 mg/day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the number of food products included in such questionnaires may be very high. Such questionnaires, covering inter alia folate intake assessment, commonly include over 100 items [ 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ], or even over 200 items, while it is stated that completing a 235-item questionnaire adapted by Fayet [ 20 ] from the 145-item Blue Mountain Eye Study Food Frequency Questionnaire [ 47 ] takes approximately 45 min [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative validity is often assessed by the use of different statistical analyses, including correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots, cross-classification, and weighted Cohen’s kappa coefficients [ 179 , 180 , 181 , 182 , 183 , 184 ]. However, only a few recent studies have reported on the validation of methods to assess choline and betaine intakes [ 159 , 185 , 186 , 187 ]. This could be related to the fact that the first food composition database for these nutrients only became available for use less than 15 years ago [ 148 ].…”
Section: Dietary Assessment Methods and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A tendency for higher absolute choline and betaine intakes estimated from an FFQ compared to the mean intake from the reference method has been reported in the United States and Europe [ 159 , 186 , 187 ]. In addition, the estimated energy intake tended to be higher in the FFQ compared to 24HR, which supports the overestimation of intakes.…”
Section: Dietary Assessment Methods and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%