1974
DOI: 10.1002/asi.4630250108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A metalanguage for systematic research on human communication via natural language

Abstract: Systematic research on human communication will be enhanced by access to a metalanguage, which analyzes natural language texts rapidly and accurately into their structural counterparts. A rationale for constructing the metalanguage is provided in the context of a long-range program of research, and illustrated by reference to an existing Computer-Assisted Language Analysis System (CALAS) for use with English language texts. Such a metalanguage has immediate practical applications. Its underlying rationale also… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on our theory of meaning in language and prior work, we constructed a model of the psychological treatment process (Meara & Patton, 1984;Patton et al, 1977;Pepinsky, 1974;Pepinsky, 1984;Pepinsky & DeStefano, 1983;Rush et al, 1974). In the model, psychological treatment is construed as a process of social influence that is interactively persuasive.…”
Section: Language and Psychological Treatment: A Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Based on our theory of meaning in language and prior work, we constructed a model of the psychological treatment process (Meara & Patton, 1984;Patton et al, 1977;Pepinsky, 1974;Pepinsky, 1984;Pepinsky & DeStefano, 1983;Rush et al, 1974). In the model, psychological treatment is construed as a process of social influence that is interactively persuasive.…”
Section: Language and Psychological Treatment: A Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convergence (Pepinsky & Karst, 1964) and tracking between the participants in the similar frequency of their use of grammatical structures (Bieber, 1978;Edwards, 1978;May, 1977;Meara et al, 1981;Oster, 1979); 2. counselor and client preference for the same discussion topics (Patton, 1969); 3. the probability that one participant's remarks will follow, or sequence, the topic of the other participant's remarks (Friedlander & Phillips, 1984); and 4. the extent to which one or both participants find it necessary to comment or otherwise talk about their talk (Garfinkel & Sacks, 1971;Patton, 1984). In this case, comments on the conversation Pepinsky, 1974;d. Pepinsky & DeStefano, 1983;Rush et a/., 1974). itself are attempts to remedy the indefiniteness or alter the sense of each other's talk, that is, attempts to establish common understanding.…”
Section: Language and Psychological Treatment: A Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Pepinsky has described three levels in the study of languages which he calls, collectively, the "schemapiric view" of language study (26). These three levels are the empirical, the analytical and the formal (see Fig.…”
Section: The Surrogates In Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%