2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11306-017-1274-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A metabolomics-based approach for non-invasive diagnosis of chromosomal anomalies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Instrumental analyses were performed with a GC-MS system (GC-2010 Plus gas chromatograph and QP2010SE mass spectrometer; Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan). The analytical details are reported in Troisi et al [21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Metabolite Extraction Derivatization and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instrumental analyses were performed with a GC-MS system (GC-2010 Plus gas chromatograph and QP2010SE mass spectrometer; Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan). The analytical details are reported in Troisi et al [21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Metabolite Extraction Derivatization and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metabolite identi cation was performed according to Troisi et al [23], brie y, the linear index difference maximum tolerance was set to 10, while the minimum matching for NIST library search was set to 85% (Level 2 identi cation according to Metabolomics Standards Initiative [MSI]) [27]. Metabolites that emerged as the most relevant in separating cases from controls (see below) were further con rmed using external standards (MSI level = 1).…”
Section: Metabolite Extraction Derivatization and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, machine learning techniques and especially ANNs in the eld of diagnosis of fetal abnormalities have been provided robust results (19,21,22). But what can accurately demonstrate the capacity of a ANN for early detection of a disease is the optimal ANN architecture (13).…”
Section: -Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These samples were used to train the classification models in the same manner as our previous reports. 13,15,16 The diagnostic performances of the resulting models were evaluated using cross-validation. The second cohort collected samples from a population with unknown EC status to test the screening performance of the trained models (ie, independent test set).…”
Section: Study Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%