2014
DOI: 10.1891/1061-3749.22.1.77
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Meta-Synthesis of Health-Related Self-Efficacy Instrumentation: Problems and Suggestions

Abstract: The piecemeal fashion of self-efficacy instrumentation has resulted in incomparable self-efficacy measures of similar domains of health functioning. A trans-domain framework, thus, is warranted. Suggestions are provided for solving other problems in self-efficacy instrumentation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bandura's self-efficacy theory is often applied in studies on human motivation, attitude, and behavior [[12], [13], [14]]. Self-efficacy can influence how people feel, think, and behave in different situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bandura's self-efficacy theory is often applied in studies on human motivation, attitude, and behavior [[12], [13], [14]]. Self-efficacy can influence how people feel, think, and behave in different situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-efficacy can influence how people feel, think, and behave in different situations. According to this theory, self-efficacy is the most significant predictor of behavioral intentions; hence, it is closely related to one's belief, attitude, and behavior [14]. People with higher self-efficacy are more confident in performing a specific behavior than those with lower self-efficacy [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The behaviour items were positively-worded, whereas the emotion and identity items were negatively-worded (see Figure 1). The behaviour items were accompanied by an 11-point self-efficacy response scale, whilst the emotion and identity items were accompanied by an 11-point agree/disagree response scale (Rattray and Jones 2007;Sheer 2014). This first iteration of the questionnaire was entitled the SPaRQ-49.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, over time, the concept of SE developed into a more general construct, namely the non-specific confidence people may have in managing their life in both routine and novel situations, and believed to be less open to change [ 24 ]. In a systematic review on the assessment of SE, Sheer [ 25 ] described three types of SE scales: trait-like or general SE (e.g., general stable belief in one’s ability to accomplish goals); domain-specific SE (e.g., a belief concerning managing aspects of chronic illness); and task-specific SE (e.g., a belief that is context bound involving a specific behavior). The last two are a further differentiation of the state aspect described above into domain and task-specific aspects of SE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%