1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(18)30830-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials of Fish Oil in Prevention of Restenosis Following Coronary Angioplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the studies on restenosis after angioplasty, undoubtedly consisting of patient populations with a mixed type of atherogenesis-promoting factors, firm conclusion as to the effectiveness of fish oil can not be drawn because there is not (yet) a unidirectional trend. We agree with others [96] that a large trial evaluating the effect of fish oil on restenosis in angioplasty patients by coronary angiography may provide an answer. We also believe that it is time to reach a consensus as to which animal models mimic most closely a particular human situalion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the studies on restenosis after angioplasty, undoubtedly consisting of patient populations with a mixed type of atherogenesis-promoting factors, firm conclusion as to the effectiveness of fish oil can not be drawn because there is not (yet) a unidirectional trend. We agree with others [96] that a large trial evaluating the effect of fish oil on restenosis in angioplasty patients by coronary angiography may provide an answer. We also believe that it is time to reach a consensus as to which animal models mimic most closely a particular human situalion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Coronary angiography was conducted in almost all patients in four studies [87,88,91,93] and selectively in four [89,90,92,94], while in the study by Slack et al [86] only exercise tests were evaluated. O'Connor and colleagues have recently performed a meta-analysis of seven [86][87][88][89][90][91]94] studies (see also Table 6) [96] and concluded that fish oil yields a small to moderate reduction in restenosis rate (6-46%). The large range was due to the small sample size of the studies (82-194 patients) and therefore only a randomized clinical trial involving over 880 patients can reliably answer the question whether fish oil is effective as a non-pharmacological adjuvant in the prevention of restenosis.…”
Section: Restenosis After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example in the MRFIT intervention trial13 in which, being a large trial, there were over 1000 deaths the ratio of neoplastic deaths was 140 intervention, 149 control. Summarising an analysis of 26 randomised trials of cholesterol reduction (50,000 patients, details not provided), apparently mostly drug trials, M~M a h o n~~ found the relative risk of cancer death among those assigned cholesterol-lowering treatments was 1.1 k 0.1 and for -trauma death 1.3 t-0.2. D01ecek~~ has examined the relationship between disease incidence and polyunsaturated fat intake, 18:2 n-6 and 18:3 n-3 and fish n-3s from four dietary recalls in the large MRFIT intervention trial.…”
Section: Selections From the Full Set Of Major Dietary Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three meta-analyses performed to examine these studies concluded that fish oils do prevent restenosis. [14][15][16] However, the most recently published meta-analysis was only able to document clinically important benefits in 5 of 12 studies. 15 A 13th study was excluded due to high fish oil intake.…”
Section: Fish Oils In Disease Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%