2006
DOI: 10.1243/13506501jet126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mechanistic model of spherical particle entrapment in elliptical contacts

Abstract: The dynamic interaction of solid, spherical particles with the counterfaces of concentrated, dry or lubricated, conforming or non-conforming, rolling -sliding elliptical contacts is mathematically analysed. Criteria for the entrapment or rejection of particles are postulated on the basis of the resolution of mechanical and fluid forces on a particle for given contact geometry and operating conditions. Three-dimensional maps of the various force components on a particle are presented for a typical application, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, the analysis of particle elastoplastic deformation is not performed unless the entrapment criteria are satisfied. [113][114][115] The second part is about modelling how a ductile particle passes through a concentrated contact. 59,62,99 This involves resolution of mechanical contact forces on the particle and fluid forces in the presence of a lubricant, the outcome being the evaluation of particle's motion.…”
Section: Numerical Model Introductory Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, the analysis of particle elastoplastic deformation is not performed unless the entrapment criteria are satisfied. [113][114][115] The second part is about modelling how a ductile particle passes through a concentrated contact. 59,62,99 This involves resolution of mechanical contact forces on the particle and fluid forces in the presence of a lubricant, the outcome being the evaluation of particle's motion.…”
Section: Numerical Model Introductory Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the presence of hard particulate matter in the contact patch increases the rail and wheel wear through various modes such as abrasion, indentation and scuffing [47]. In the real track scenario considered here, there can be some variation in the friction coefficient over the length of the track due to various reasons.…”
Section: Wear Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51 Given the complexity of the contact mechanics to analyse the passage of even a single particle through a contact, it comes as no surprise that numerical models are rare and variable in their features and limitations. According to the author's own research, [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63] the model of the passage of a single particle through a concentrated contact with clearance smaller than the particle's minimum dimension includes the following elements: (a) particle entrainment via the lubricating medium prior to reaching the contact; 53 (b) particle entrapment based on force-equilibrium criteria once the particle is pinched; [57][58][59] (c) stress, strain and damage analysis during particle compression, including thermoelastic effects, [54][55][56] elastoplastic effects, 60 thermoelastoplastic effects 51 or thermoviscoplastic effects, 61 depending on the operating conditions, as well as geometrical effects in case of surface pile-up around dents 63 and tribochemical effects in cases of high frictional heating. 62 With a numerical model as the one just described, calculating contact forces on a squashing particle is part of the stress analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the author's latest ductile debris model, 51,60-62 recapitulated in Nikas 62 and with sub-models on particle entrapment in non-conformal line contacts 57 and both conformal and nonconformal elliptical contacts, 58,59 the previously stated shortcomings and simplifying assumptions are all eliminated. The model was gradually constructed with rigorous experimental validation in each of five successive development stages, adding micro-hardness modelling, 60 thermoelastoplasticity, 51 thermoviscoplasticity, 61 tribochemistry 62 and geometrical (surface pile-up) effects, 63 although the last two are not of concern in the present study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%