2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10546-015-0051-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mechanical Drag Coefficient Formulation and Urban Canopy Parameter Assimilation Technique for Complex Urban Environments

Abstract: A mechanical drag coefficient formulation was implemented into the Building Effect Parameterization + Building Energy Model system coupled with the mesoscale Weather Research Forecasting model to improve the representation of the wind speed in complex urban environments. Previously, this formulation had been assessed only against spatially-averaged results from computational fluid dynamical simulations in idealized urban configurations. The main objective is to evaluate its performance over a real city. The in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
22
2
Order By: Relevance
“…BEP and BEM have also been modified to account for latent heat fluxes from air conditioning, based on the work of Gutierrez et al () as well as effects of varying building packing density on drag coefficient (Gutiérrez et al , ). Cooling towers use evaporative cooling processes to remove heat from water used in air conditioning systems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…BEP and BEM have also been modified to account for latent heat fluxes from air conditioning, based on the work of Gutierrez et al () as well as effects of varying building packing density on drag coefficient (Gutiérrez et al , ). Cooling towers use evaporative cooling processes to remove heat from water used in air conditioning systems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This evaporative cooling effectively partitions urban heat fluxes into sensible and latent, adding a hydrological component to BEM. Gutiérrez et al , implemented impacts of building packing density into the BEP code following results from Reynolds averaged numerical simulations (RANS) of Santiago et al (), who related buildings' drag coefficient to their packing density through a series of experiments, as follows: Ceq()λp=false{true3.32λp0.47forλp0.291.85forλp>0.29. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the drag coefficient becomes a function of the plan area per unit ground area, λ P . The new implementation of the drag coefficient term in equation , which is discussed in section 4, is as follows [ Santiago and Martilli , ; Gutiérrez et al , ]: Cdragnew={,3.32λP0.47,when0.25emλP0.291.85,when0.25emλP>0.29 where λ P is the plan area per unit ground area.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table shows the New‐drag Case evaluation results for 10 m wind speed, 2 m air temperature, and relative humidity for the stations in Table . The implementation of the new BEP‐BEM urban parameterization drag coefficient significantly reduces the mean value from 3.15 m/s to 2.63 m/s (also investigated for New York city by Gutiérrez et al []), and the mean bias error of 10 m wind speed from 0.70 m/s to 0.17 m/s. Meanwhile, the increase in drag force and TKE within the urban canopy layer increases the mean surface air temperature of the 25 stations by 0.20°C.…”
Section: Effect Of Urban Morphology On Uhic and Slbc Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows a map of the region being analyzed. According to Stewart and Oke (2012), the airport locations (LGA, JFK, and EWR sites) can be categorized as a Local Climate Zone 8, and the CCNY site as a Local Climate Zone 1, which is mostly high-rise residential buildings with an average height of 25-65 m. Additional information on the land-use categories for New York City can be found in Gutiérrez et al (2015a), where high-resolution, land-cover information was used for mapping the urban morphology (e.g., the building height and landuse category according to Fry et al 2011). The land-use characteristics around each airport are as follows: around the JFK site are low-rise residential units, around the LGA site are high-rise residential and commercial units, while the EWR site is surrounded by a commercial district, with average building heights adjacent to each airport of 8.5-10, 15-25, and 8-10 m, respectively.…”
Section: Measurements and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%