2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2012.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A measure-theoretic approach to the theory of dense hypergraphs

Abstract: In this paper we develop a measure-theoretic method to treat problems in hypergraph theory.Our central theorem is a correspondence principle between three objects: An increasing hypergraph sequence, a measurable set in an ultraproduct space and a measurable set in a finite dimensional Lebesgue space. Using this correspondence principle we build up the theory of dense hypergraphs from scratch. Along these lines we give new proofs for the Hypergraph Removal Lemma, the Hypergraph Regularity Lemma, the Counting Le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
185
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
185
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. , t k+2 is a k + 1-th order convolution of functions in F k and thus it is orthogonal to g. Then the non-standard version of Fubini's theorem [3] finishes the proof.…”
Section: By Theorem 15 the Statement Is Equivalent With The Fact Thatmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…. , t k+2 is a k + 1-th order convolution of functions in F k and thus it is orthogonal to g. Then the non-standard version of Fubini's theorem [3] finishes the proof.…”
Section: By Theorem 15 the Statement Is Equivalent With The Fact Thatmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…One is to show that our regularity lemma is well behaved with respect to counting and the second goal is to show that function sequences in which the density of every fixed configuration converges have a nice limit object which is a measurable function on a nilspace. This fits well into the recently developed graph and hypergraph limit theories [17], [2], [18], [19], [3].…”
Section: Then For Functions On Groups In a Theorem 2 Holds With A-nilmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let me mention that later Elek and Szegedy [7] very surprisingly used logic to prove the removal lemma as an ultraproduct. But no combinatorial proof has been given for Theorem 1.6 so far.…”
Section: Ergodic Approachmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We refer to [CKT-D11] for background on ultraproducts of measure preserving actions and also [ES08] for background on ultraproducts of measure spaces. Our notation has some changes from that of [CKT-D11] and is as follows.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%