2015 European Control Conference (ECC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ecc.2015.7331083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mean Field control approach for demand side management of large populations of Thermostatically Controlled Loads

Abstract: This paper presents a Mean Field (MF) control approach for demand side management of large populations of flexible electric loads, such as electrical cooling/heating appliances, called Thermostatically Controlled Loads (TCLs). We model the switching dynamics of each individual TCL as the solution of a local optimization problem, characterized by individual cost function, comfort constraints, cooling/heating rates and external temperature. We consider that a central utility company broadcasts macroscopic incent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal controls u * i (t) (top left) with constraints C1-C3 are same as those shown in Figure 5. However, the optimal indoor temperatures * (i) 123 (t) (right bottom) are different from * (i) 12 (t) (left bottom, same as in Figure 5), for i = 1, 2 TCLs. The subscript 123 in * (i) 123 (t) denotes that constraints C1-C3 are active [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] Combining the aforementioned two steps, we conclude that, for̂(t) strictly decreasing, the optimal indoor temperature trajectory found in Step 1 is the optimal among all feasible indoor temperature trajectories.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 91%
“…The optimal controls u * i (t) (top left) with constraints C1-C3 are same as those shown in Figure 5. However, the optimal indoor temperatures * (i) 123 (t) (right bottom) are different from * (i) 12 (t) (left bottom, same as in Figure 5), for i = 1, 2 TCLs. The subscript 123 in * (i) 123 (t) denotes that constraints C1-C3 are active [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] Combining the aforementioned two steps, we conclude that, for̂(t) strictly decreasing, the optimal indoor temperature trajectory found in Step 1 is the optimal among all feasible indoor temperature trajectories.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, the cited literature does not consider constraints on control inputs when deriving optimal control laws. In contrast, [Bagagiolo et Bauso, 2013] and [Grammatico et al, 2015] study controls of the power demands of a large number of home appliances under an MFG framework, in the presence of saturated controls. A chattering switching control is implemented in [Bagagiolo et Bauso, 2013], and at equilibrium the mean temperature and the main frequency are regulated at the desired values.…”
Section: Research Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, we shall be dealing here with piecewise smooth controls. In [Grammatico et al, 2015], a pricing incentives scheme is implemented for the entire population based on the current aggregated power demand where individual control is bang-bang-like switching. In [Paccagnan et al, 2015], the set of feasible aggregated power trajectories are characterized such that a population of TCLs can follow them, where each TCL has a hybrid dynamics and the mode switching rate is constrained.…”
Section: Research Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This data varies greatly depending on the country, city and cost and availability of electricity with respect to natural gas or other fossil fuels. These appliances are controlled by a thermostat and therefore are characterized by a simple ON/OFF power consumption dynamics which can be modulated to act as energy storage devices to provide ancillary services to the smart grid, see [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Thus, large populations of actively controlled TCLs can effectively add some flexibility to modulate the urban electric power demand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some promising methods for electric Demand Side Management (DSM) that focus on controlling TCLs can be found in [10], [11], [7]. There, centralized strategies and distributed decision making methods supported by a centralized information aggregator are exploited to address the problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%