2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2015.06.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mathematical and numerical framework for magnetoacoustic tomography with magnetic induction

Abstract: We provide a mathematical analysis and a numerical framework for magnetoacoustic tomography with magnetic induction. The imaging problem is to reconstruct the conductivity distribution of biological tissue from measurements of the Lorentz force induced tissue vibration. We begin with reconstructing from the acoustic measurements the divergence of the Lorentz force, which is acting as the source term in the acoustic wave equation. Then we recover the electric current density from the divergence of the Lorentz f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A robust way of solving this inverse problem is to formulate it as an optimal control problem, where the condiuctivity parameter is the control variable that drives the interior electric field close to the measured value, with dynamics governed by the conductivity PDE. Such optimal control methods has been used previously in the context of ultrasonically-induced Lorentz force electrical impedance tomography [5], magnetoacoustic tomography [6,7,38] and acousto-electric tomography (AET) [1,41]. In [5], the authors use an optimal control framework to recover the conductivity distribution from the measurements of current induced by static magnetic field through the Lorentz force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A robust way of solving this inverse problem is to formulate it as an optimal control problem, where the condiuctivity parameter is the control variable that drives the interior electric field close to the measured value, with dynamics governed by the conductivity PDE. Such optimal control methods has been used previously in the context of ultrasonically-induced Lorentz force electrical impedance tomography [5], magnetoacoustic tomography [6,7,38] and acousto-electric tomography (AET) [1,41]. In [5], the authors use an optimal control framework to recover the conductivity distribution from the measurements of current induced by static magnetic field through the Lorentz force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter, called inverse problem, consists of two steps, i.e. reconstructing the distribution of the Lorentz force divergence according to the ultrasonic signals collected by piezoelectric transducers, and finally the imaging of the electrical conductivity distribution (Ammari et al, 2015;_ Zywica, 2016). The detailed analysis of an electromagnetic induction in low-conductivity objects is very important for the next steps in the tomographic process of image reconstruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of the electromagnetics with the ultrasound is an emerging multiphysical field imaging with both of high contrast and high resolution, such as magneto-acoustic tomography with magnetic induction(MAT-MI) [4][5][6], microwave induced thermo-acoustic imaging(MI-TAI) [7] and magnetically mediated thermoacoustic imaging(MM-TAI) [8][9]. Thermo-acoustic imaging with the current injection is a new multi-physical field imaging method, the principle was proposed and the experiment was carried out aiming at low conductivity phantom in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%