2016
DOI: 10.1002/cplu.201600304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Luminescent Zinc(II) Metal–Organic Framework for Selective Detection of Nitroaromatics, Fe3+ and CrO42−: A Versatile Threefold Fluorescent Sensor

Abstract: A new ZnII metal–organic framework, [Zn6(L)3(DMA)4]⋅5 DMA (H4L=[1,1′:3′,1′′‐terphenyl]‐3,3′′,5,5′′‐tetracarboxylic acid, DMA=dimethylacetamide), has been synthesized and characterized. The structure contains a three‐dimensional 3,4,4,6‐connected net with (4.62)2(66)(66)(42.610.83) topology and displays selective detection of nitrobenzene, CrO42− and Fe3+ ions. The present work thus indicates that this metal–organic framework could be a prospective candidate for developing novel luminescence sensors for the sel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensing abilities of 1•4H 2 O•DMAC for Cu 2+ , Ag + and Fe 3+ are comparable with these of the documented MOFs. [ 9–11,13–15,21–23,25,28,31,32 ] For example, {[Zn 5 (L) 2 (DMF) 2 (H 2 O) 2 ]·2DMF} (H 5 L = 3,5‐di(3′,5′‐dicarboxylphenyl)benzoic acid) exhibited the K sv of 1.10 × 10 3 M −1 , 2.24 × 10 3 M −1 and 4.49 × 10 4 M −1 for Cu 2+ , Ag + and Fe 3+ , and the detection limit of 1.01 ppm, 0.64 ppm and 1.30 ppm for Cu 2+ , Ag + and Fe 3+ . [ 9 ] {[Eu(2,7‐NDS)(IP)(OH)(H 2 O)]·mH 2 O} n (2,7‐NDS = 2,7‐naphthalenedisulfonate, IP = 1H‐imidazo[4,5‐f][1,10]‐phenanthroline) showed the high K sv of 1.19 × 10 5 M −1 and 1.18 × 10 5 M −1 for Fe 3+ and Ag + , and the detection limit of 0.277 μM and 0.272 μM for Fe 3+ and Ag + .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The sensing abilities of 1•4H 2 O•DMAC for Cu 2+ , Ag + and Fe 3+ are comparable with these of the documented MOFs. [ 9–11,13–15,21–23,25,28,31,32 ] For example, {[Zn 5 (L) 2 (DMF) 2 (H 2 O) 2 ]·2DMF} (H 5 L = 3,5‐di(3′,5′‐dicarboxylphenyl)benzoic acid) exhibited the K sv of 1.10 × 10 3 M −1 , 2.24 × 10 3 M −1 and 4.49 × 10 4 M −1 for Cu 2+ , Ag + and Fe 3+ , and the detection limit of 1.01 ppm, 0.64 ppm and 1.30 ppm for Cu 2+ , Ag + and Fe 3+ . [ 9 ] {[Eu(2,7‐NDS)(IP)(OH)(H 2 O)]·mH 2 O} n (2,7‐NDS = 2,7‐naphthalenedisulfonate, IP = 1H‐imidazo[4,5‐f][1,10]‐phenanthroline) showed the high K sv of 1.19 × 10 5 M −1 and 1.18 × 10 5 M −1 for Fe 3+ and Ag + , and the detection limit of 0.277 μM and 0.272 μM for Fe 3+ and Ag + .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the quenching mechanism of 1•4H 2 O•DMAC for Cr 2 O 7 2− , CrO 4 2− , MnO 4 − and Fe 3+ can be assumed to the energy‐transfer. [ 9–15,21–30 ] However, no overlap between the UV–visible absorption spectra of Cu 2+ , Ag + and other ions with the excitation and emission spectra of 1•4H 2 O•DMAC . N1s X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) studies showed that the N1s peaks from triazole nitrogen atoms in 1•4H 2 O•DMAC were at 399.8, 401.8 and 405.2 eV (Figure 13).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A few of examples of porous MOFs with Lewis basic sites have been reported, including [Eu(btpca)(H 2 O)]·2DMF·3H 2 O [H 3 btpca = 1,1′,1″-(benzene-1,3,5-triyl)tripiperidine-4-carboxylic acid] with multiple Lewis basic triazinyl nitrogen atoms for the sensing of Fe 3+ ions [6], and [Eu 3 (bpydb) 3 (HCOO)(μ 3 -OH) 2 (DMF)]·(DMF) 3 (H 2 O) 2 [bpydbH 2 = 4,4′-(4,4′-bipyridine-2,6-diyl)dibenzoic acid] exhibits multi-responsive luminescence sensing of small organic molecules and inorganic ions [7]. These results highlight the significance of such Lewis basic sites within porous MOFs for their functional properties [8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The luminescent intensity of 4 decreased to 98% at 160 ppm (Figure 6c). Following the 3δ/slope, the TNP detection limit is calculated to be 1.99 ppm [18][19][20]. The quenching constant and limit of detection for TNP by 4 were found to be comparable with the reported LMOF detection of TNP at the ppb level using MOFs [21][22][23], excluding the lowest detection limit so far reported, by Ghosh et al (LOD = 2.9 ppb (12.9 nM, K SV 4.6 × 104 M −1 ) using bio-MOF) [23].…”
Section: Sensing Of Metal Ions and Small Organic Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%